Article Sidebar

Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 37

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Numeracy skills are essential for prospective mathematics teachers as they bridge mathematical concepts with real-life applications. However, many prospective mathematics teachers face challenges in applying these concepts to practical situations. This study aims to analyze the conceptual and procedural errors made by prospective mathematics teachers when solving numeracy problems within the context of "Save Our Water." A descriptive research design was employed, utilizing a numeracy test adapted from the Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA) and semi-structured interviews as research instruments. The study involved 30 prospective mathematics teachers from the University of Jambi, Indonesia. The findings revealed that conceptual errors primarily stemmed from reliance on rote memorization of formulas without a deeper conceptual understanding. Procedural errors were attributed to difficulties in unit conversion, incorrect formula application, and improper manipulation of formulas. To address these issues, the study recommends incorporating contextual approaches, problem-based learning, and project-based learning strategies that connect mathematical concepts to real-world contexts. Additionally, the use of visual aids, such as diagrams and 3D models, is suggested to enhance conceptual understanding and strengthen the connection between abstract concepts and practical applications. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of these instructional approaches in improving numeracy skills and enhancing the teaching readiness of prospective mathematics teachers.

Keywords

Conceptual and Procedural Errors Numeracy Prospective Math Teachers Saving Our Water Problems

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Winarni, S., Kamid, Marzal, J., & Asrial. (2025). Numeracy skill development in prospective mathematics teachers: Challenges and opportunities in real-world contexts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp91-110
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akperov, N., & Yessenkeldy, T. (2023). The role of contextual tasks in the formation of mathematical literacy of students in math lessons at school. https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-26.05.2023.072
  2. Amir, S., Mahboob, U., Sethi, A., & Jamil, B. (2022). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 18(1), 68–69. https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v18i1.1381
  3. Baharuddin, M. R., Baharuddin, H., Jumarniati, & Beta, P. (2021). “Investigating students error when solving whole number problem”: Case in procedural error and concept error. Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Natural and Social Science Education (ICNSSE 2020), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210430.016
  4. Bjälkebring, P., & Peters, E. (2021). Money Matters (Especially if You Are Good at Math): Numeracy, verbal intelligence, education, and income in satisfaction judgments. Plos One, 16(11), e0259331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259331
  5. Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  6. Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
  7. Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic.pdf. Cognitive Science, 2(2), 155–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0202_4
  8. Choi, L., & Park, M. Y. (2022). Teaching practicum during covid-19: Pre-Service english language teachers’ professional identities and motivation. Sage Open, 12(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119472
  9. Deep, S., Ahmed, A., Suleman, N., Abbas, M. Z., Naza, U., Shaheen, H., & Razzaq, A. (2020). The problem-based learning approach towards developing soft skills: A systematic review. The Qualitative Report, 25(11), 4029–4054. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4114
  10. Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2018). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based Strategies for Enhancing Teaching and Learning. taylorfrancis.com. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116585
  11. Faragher, R. M. (2023). Numeracy. In A practical guide to educating learners with down syndrome (p. 14). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429262739-21
  12. Folomieieva, N., Koriakin, O., Matsenko, L., Siaska, І., & Fed, I. (2024). Problem-based learning in higher education: a path towards training innovative and competent specialists. Amazonia Investiga, 13(77), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2024.77.05.15
  13. Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: a survey of the state of the field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1
  14. Groves, S. (2013). Numeracy across the curriculum: Recognising and responding to the demands and numeracy opportunities inherent in secondary teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 3, 48–61. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/122/98
  15. Haigh, J. (2016). Mathematics in Everyday Life.
  16. Hamidi, H., Sarjan, M., Sudirman, S., Muliadi, A., Fauzi, I., Yamin, M., Azizi, A., Muttaqin, M. Z. H., Rasyidi, M., Ardiansyah, B., Khery, Y., & Rahmatiah, R. (2022). Literature review: Philosophical views on ecotourism-based contextual science learning. Journal of Science and Science Education, 3(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v3i2.2288
  17. Hasanah, S., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Assessment of contextual learning in mathematics education. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2575(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0111142
  18. Hawamdeh, M., & Adamu, I. (2021). Problem-based learning (pbl): A Deep Approach to Learning in the 21st Century (pp. 38–56). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4534-8.CH003
  19. Herrera, L. M. M., Ordóñez, S. J., & Ruiz-Loza, S. (2024). Enhancing mathematical education with spatial visualization tools. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1229126
  20. Jitendra, A. K., & Woodward, J. R. (2019). The role of visual representations in mathematical word problems. Academic Press, 5, 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815952-1.00011-6
  21. Law, F. F., Shahrill, M., & Mundia, L. (2015). Investigating students’ conceptual knowledge and procedural skills in the learning of college level trigonometry. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 9(11), 952–962. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.9.2588
  22. Luo, Y., & Yu, B. (2020). Research on the teaching of understanding mathematics problems in elementary schools. In In: Zhu, S.C., Xie, S., Ma, Y., McDougall, D. (eds) Reciprocal Learning for Cross-Cultural Mathematics Education . Intercultural Reciprocal Learning in Chinese and Western Education (pp. 201–219). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56838-2_11
  23. Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, J. (2016). A Study of Errors and Misconceptions in the Learning of Addition and Subtraction of Directed Numbers in Grade 8. Sage Open, 6(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671375
  24. Maralova, B. (2024). Development and cultivation of mathematical literacy: a pedagogical perspective. Eurasian Science Review, 2(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-55
  25. Mathaba, P. N., Bayaga, A., Tîrnovan, D., & Bossé, M. J. (2024). Error analysis in algebra learning: Exploring misconceptions and cognitive levels. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp575-592
  26. Merenluoto, K., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: Towards a systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 519–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.016
  27. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). In qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. In Thousand Oaks, California : Sage Publications.
  28. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
  29. Nayak, J. G., Hartzler, A. L., Macleod, L. C., Izard, J. P., & ... (2016). Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(3), 448–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.009
  30. Nelson, G., & Powell, S. R. (2017). Computation Error Analysis: Students With Mathematics Difficulty Compared to Typically Achieving Students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417745627
  31. Niss, M. A., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
  32. None, N. (2022). On understanding in mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 41(4), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrac016
  33. Nuraini, N. L. S., Cholifah, P. S., & Laksono, W. C. (2018). Mathematics Errors in Elementary School: A Meta-Synthesis Study. Atlantis Press, 244, 148–151. https://doi.org/10.2991/ecpe-18.2018.32
  34. Österholm, M. (2007). A reading comprehension perspective on problem solving. http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:22663/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  35. Pourdavood, B. R., McCarthy, K., & McCafferty, T. (2020). The impact of mental computation on children’s mathematical communication, problem solving, reasoning, and algebraic thinking. Athens Journal of Education, 7(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.7-3-1
  36. Ratnaningsih, N., & Hidayat, E. (2021). Error analysis and its causal factors in solving mathematical literacy problems in terms of habits of mind. 1764(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012104
  37. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, 1118–1134. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014
  38. Rosada, A., & Luthfiana, M. (2022). Systematic literatur review: model pembelajaran contextual teaching and learning (ctl) pada materi bangun. Journal of Mathematics Science and Education, 51(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.31540/jmse.v5i1.1620
  39. Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2023). Identification of students’ conceptual and procedural errors in solving problems in three-dimensional material. Devotion, 4(3), 788–797. https://doi.org/10.36418/devotion.v4i3.433
  40. Sa, L. (2020). Research on the effectiveness of educational internship——A Case Study on Primary Education Major. Advances in Higher Education, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v4i9.2629
  41. Samosir, C. M., Herman, T., Prabawanto, S., Melani, R., & Mefiana, S. A. (2024). Students’ Difficulty in Understanding Problems in the Contextual Problem-Solving Process. Prisma, 13(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i1.3726
  42. Sellings, P., Felstead, K., & Goriss-Hunter, A. (2018). Developing pre-service teachers: The impact of an embedded framework in literacy and numeracy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.1
  43. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
  44. Sperafico, Y. L. S., Dorneles, B. V., & Golbert, C. S. (2013). Análise de erros na resolução de problemas com equações algébricas do 1o grau: um estudo com alunos do 8o ano do Ensino Fundamental. Boletim Gepem, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.4322/GEPEM.2014.035
  45. Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.018
  46. Star, J. R., Tuomela, D., Joglar-Prieto, N., Hästö, P., Palkki, R., Abánades, M. A., Pejlare, J., Jiang, R., Li, L., & Liu, R. (2022). Exploring students’ procedural flexibility in three countries. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00322-y
  47. Suastika, I. K., & Suwanti, V. (2019). College student’s error analysis based on their mathematical connections on graph representation. Jpmi (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i1.904
  48. Susanto, D., Sihombing, S., Radjawane, M. M., & Wardani, A. K. (2021). Inspirasi Pembelajaran yang Menguatkan Numerasi Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika untuk Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama Direktorat. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Pendidikan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi RI.
  49. Tasman, F., & Yenti, I. N. (2018). Analysis of Students’ Error in Understanding the Mathematical Problems. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 285, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICM2E-18.2018.16
  50. Toklu, D. A., & Hursen, C. (2021). Assessment of the Educational Needs of Preschool Teacher Candidates as Regards Teaching Practice. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/426
  51. Tout, D. (2020). Evolution of adult numeracy from quantitative literacy to numeracy: Lessons learned from international assessments. International Review of Education, 66(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11159-020-09831-4
  52. Wiest, L. R., & Amankonah, F. O. (2019). Conceptual versus procedural approaches to ordering fractions. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.30935/SCIMATH/9534
  53. Yanti, A. W. (2011). Learning Mathematics To Grow Metacognitive Ability In Understanding And Mathematic Problems Solving On Limit. International Seminar and the Fourth National Conference on Mathematics Education 2011, 251–261. http://eprints.uny.ac.id/1012/1/P - 25.pdf
  54. Ye, H., Ng, O.-L., & Cui, Z. (2023). Conceptualizing Flexibility in Programming-Based Mathematical Problem-Solving. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 594–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231209773
  55. Yen, T. H. P., Nguyen T. P., N., & Hoang T., T. (2023). The Effect of Using Project-Based Learning on Improving Self-Regulated Language Learning Among English-Majored Students at Ba Ria – Vung Tau University, Viet Nam. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(04), 2632–2637. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i4-42
  56. Yesseikyzy, A., Kydyrbaeva, G., Batyrbayeva, A., Meirambek, A., Zabiyeva, K., & Kasteyeva, G. (2022). Development of the Logical Thinking of Future Mathematics Teachers Through the Use of Digital Educational Technologies. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2001–2012. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7548