Article Sidebar

Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 92

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Recent discourse in mathematics education emphasizes the need for culturally relevant pedagogy and the integration of higher-order thinking skills, yet limited research explores the intersection of ethnomathematics and computational thinking within school curricula. This study addresses this gap by proposing a novel instructional framework that incorporates computational thinking into the ethnomathematical exploration of Rumoh Aceh—a traditional Acehnese house—within the context of junior high school geometry education in Indonesia. The research aims to enhance students’ understanding of geometric concepts such as lines, angles, shapes, and spatial structures through culturally grounded learning experiences. Using the four core components of computational thinking—decomposition, abstraction, pattern recognition, and algorithmic thinking—the geometric design of Rumoh Aceh is analyzed to reveal its mathematical significance. Data collection was conducted through ethnographic methods, including observation, interviews with local experts, and documentation analysis. The findings demonstrate that applying computational thinking to cultural artifacts fosters students’ ability to recognize geometric patterns, simplify complex problems, and develop structured problem-solving strategies. Furthermore, the integration of cultural context enriches students’ appreciation of their heritage while cultivating critical thinking and mathematical reasoning. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the pedagogical value of merging ethnomathematics with computational thinking, offering a meaningful and culturally responsive approach to mathematics education.

Keywords

Computational Thinking Ethnomathematics Geometry Junior High School Level Rumoh Aceh

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Azmi, N., Arif, S., Sofyan, H., & Oktavia, R. (2025). Bridging geometry and cultures for junior high school level: Rumoh Aceh design from a computational thinking perspective. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2). Retrieved from http://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/3529
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abid. (2017). Ethnography: Linking Theory and Practices. Philosophy Study, 7(11), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2017.11.003
  2. Anwar, V. N., Darhim, D., Suhendra, S., & Nurlaelah, E. (2024). Exploring the Characteristics of Digital Pedagogy Model for Developing Computational Thinking in Mathematical Problem Solving. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 8(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.17419
  3. Barton, B. (1996). Ethnomathematics: Exploring Cultural Diversity in Mathematics. American Ethnologist, 21(4), 922–923. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a00380
  4. Björklund, C. (2008). Toddlers’ opportunities to learn mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168365
  5. Brackmann, C., Barone, D., Casali, A., Boucinha, R., & Muñoz-hernandez, S. (2016). CT Panorama of the Americas. International Symposium on Computers in Education, SIIE 2016: Learning Analytics Technologies, 1–6.
  6. Brackmann, C. P., Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., Casali, A., Robles, G., & Barone, D. (2017). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069
  7. Brenner, M. E. (1998). Adding Cognition to the Formula for Culturally Relevant Instruction in Mathematics. Anthropology Education Quarterly, 29(2), 214–244. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1998.29.2.214
  8. Brian Greer, Kosanke, Robert M, Arthur, S. (2019). Culturally Responsive Mathematics education.
  9. Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers and Education, 109, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001
  10. Cheng, C. (2024). Integration of Mathematics History into Junior Middle School Education: A Pedagogical Approach to Enhance Mathematical Literacy. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(3), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i3.6419
  11. D’Ambrosio, U. (2016). Change in Space, Urban Culture and Ethnomathematics. Human Rights in Language and STEM Education: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-405-3_12
  12. Dagienė, V., & Sentence, S. (2016). It’s computational thinking! bebras tasks in the curriculum. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9973 LNCS(Bebras), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46747-4_3
  13. Disnawati, H., & Nahak, S. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Etnomatematika Tenun Timor pada Materi Pola Bilangan. Jurnal Elemen, 5(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i1.1022
  14. Eguíluz, A., Guenaga, M., Garaizar, P., & Olivares-Rodríguez, C. (2020). Exploring the Progression of Early Programmers in a Set of Computational Thinking Challenges via Clickstream Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(1), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2768550
  15. Ernest, P. (2016). Mathematics and values. Trends in the History of Science, 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_12
  16. Faiziyah, N., Sutama, Sholihah, I., Wulandari, S., & Yudha, D. A. (2020). Enhancing Creativity through Ethnomathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3704–3710. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080850
  17. Figueiredo, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Improving computational thinking using follow and give instructions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1322. https://doi.org/10.1145/3144826.3145351
  18. Freudenthal, H. (2002). REVISITING MATHEMATICS EDUCATION. KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS. http://www.ebooks.kluweronline.com
  19. Gopinath, B., & Santhi, R. (2021). Development and Evaluation of Fishbone-Based Advanced Computational Thinking (FACT) Pedagogy: A Teacher-Student Collaborative Learning Environment in Engineering and Science Education. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120970177
  20. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034699
  21. Hanid, M. F. A., Mohamad Said, M. N. H., Yahaya, N., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). The Elements of Computational Thinking in Learning Geometry by Using Augmented Reality Application. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(2), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i02.27295
  22. Helsa, Y., Turmudi, & Juandi, D. (2023). TPACK-based hybrid learning model design for computational thinking skills achievement in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp225-252
  23. Hendriyanto, A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Geometric Thinking Ability for Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Solving Ethnomathematics Problem. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1808(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012040
  24. Kyeremeh, P., Awuah, F. K., & Dorwu, E. (2023). Integration of Ethnomathematics in Teaching Geometry: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Report. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 16(2), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.21423/JUME-V16I2A519
  25. Kyeremeh, P., Awuah, F., & Orey, D. (2024). Challenges Regarding the Integration of Ethnomathematical Perspectives into Geometry Teaching: The Faculty Reflection Patrick. 2(Agustus), 94–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4q9m8
  26. Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective: Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w
  27. Lee, T. Y., Mauriello, M. L., Ahn, J., & Bederson, B. B. (2014). CTArcade: Computational thinking with games in school age children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.06.003
  28. Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
  29. Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
  30. Novianti, Y., Amalia, L., & Deni. (2022). Ornamen Rumah Adat Aceh Utara dalam Terminologi Arsitektur The North Aceh Traditional Houses Ornaments in an Architecture Terminology. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Malikussaleh, 6(2), 136–152.
  31. Pathuddin, H., Marianii, A., & Kamariah. (2023). Ethnomathematics of Pananrang : A guidance of traditional farming system of the Buginese community. 14(2), 205–224.
  32. Pathuddin, H., & Nawawi, M. I. (2021). Buginese Ethnomathematics : Barongko Cake. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.12695.295-312
  33. Prahmana, I., Yunianto, W., Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2021). ethnomathematics : pranatamangsa system and the birth-death ceremonial in yogyakarta. 12(1), 93–112.
  34. Prahmana, R. C. I., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2020a). Belajar Geometri dan Nilai Dari Pola: Etnomatematika Pada Pola Batik Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 11(3), 439–456.
  35. Prahmana, R. C. I., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2020b). Learning geometry and values from patterns: Ethnomathematics on the batik patterns of yogyakarta, indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12949.439-456
  36. Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). Learning sets theory using shadow puppet: A study of javanese ethnomathematics. Mathematics, 9(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9222938
  37. Prahmana, R. C. I., Yunianto, W., Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2021). Ethnomathematics: Pranatamangsa system and the birth-death ceremonial in yogyakarta. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.1.11745.93-112
  38. Purniati, T., Turmudi, & Suhaedi, D. (2020). Ethnomathematics: Exploration of a mosque building and its ornaments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032042
  39. Putra, R. A., & Ekomadyo, A. S. (2023). Transformation of Architecture of Rumoh Aceh: An Encoding Process Through Semiotic. Local Wisdom : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v15i1.7632
  40. Rojas López, A., & García Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Learning Scenarios for the Subject Methodology of Programming from Evaluating the Computational Thinking of New Students. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 13(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2018.2809941
  41. Sahputra, Z., Meutia, E., Izziah, I., & Edytia, M. H. A. (2020). Teknologi Konstruksi Arsitektur Rumoh Aceh Studi Kasus: Rumoh Aceh di Desa Meugit, Kabupaten Pidie, Aceh. 041–048. https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.4.041
  42. Santos-Trigo, M. (2006). On the use of computational tools to promote students’ mathematical thinking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-006-9105-8
  43. Setiawan, H., Fauzan, A., & Arnawa, I. M. (2021). The Development of Geometrical Learning Devices Based on Rumah Gadang Ethnomathematics for Grade VII Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1742/1/012003
  44. Sfard, A. (2006). Anna Sfard Participationist Discourse on Mathematics. 153–154.
  45. Shahbari, J. A., & Daher, W. (2020). Learning congruent triangles through ethnomathematics: The case of students with difficulties in mathematics. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144950
  46. Sidek, S. F., Mohamad Yatim, M. H., & Said, C. S. (2020). Characterizing Computational Thinking for Tertiary Education Learning. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 10(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol10.sp.6.2020
  47. Spradley, J. P., & McCurdy, D. W. (2012). Conformity and Conflict: Readings in Cultural Anthropology. 411. https://books.google.com/books?id=B-OkPvuPzg0C&pgis=1
  48. Sukestiyarno, Y. L. (2023). Learning trajectory of non-Euclidean geometry through ethnomathematics learning approaches to improve spatial ability. 19(6).
  49. Sunzuma, G., & Maharaj, A. (2021a). In-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge and awareness of ethnomathematics approaches. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1736351
  50. Sunzuma, G., & Maharaj, A. (2021b). In-service Zimbabwean teachers’ obstacles in integrating ethnomathematics approaches into the teaching and learning of geometry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(5), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1825820
  51. Utami, N. W., Sayuti, S. A., & Jailani. (2019). Math and mate in javanese primbon: Ethnomathematics study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7611.341-356
  52. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  53. Yilmaz Ince, E., & Koc, M. (2021). The consequences of robotics programming education on computational thinking skills: An intervention of the Young Engineer’s Workshop (YEW). Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22321