Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 161 Download : 1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates errors and misconceptions among learners in algebraic education by utilizing Koch's error analysis method alongside the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. The primary aim of the investigation is to discern the kinds of errors and cognitive stages demonstrated by Grade 9 students when engaged in algebraic problem-solving tasks. The studies' outcomes uncover several prevalent error categories, including conjoining, cancellation, and problem-solving errors, indicating deficiencies in conceptual comprehension and procedural execution. Moreover, applying the SOLO taxonomy elucidates learners' diverse levels of understanding, with a majority position within the uni-structural or multi-structural stages. Theoretical implications underscore the necessity for tailored instructional approaches to mitigate learners' obstacles and foster a deeper grasp of algebraic principles. Consequently, this research contributes significantly to the advancement of algebraic pedagogy and provides valuable insights for curriculum enhancement, thereby facilitating improved mathematics learning outcomes.

Keywords

Algebra Learning Cognitive Levels Error Analysis Grade 9 Learners Misconceptions

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mathaba, P. N. ., Bayaga, A., Tîrnovan, D. ., & Bossé, M. J. . (2024). Error analysis in algebra learning: Exploring misconceptions and cognitive levels. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp575-592
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, A. H., Liyana, N., Abidin, Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fractions. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 58-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
  2. Agustyaningrum, N., Abadi, A. M., Sari, R. N., & Mahmudi, A. (2018). An analysis of students’ error in solving abstract algebra tasks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012118
  3. Alshwaikh, J., & Adler, J. (2017). Researchers and teachers as learners in Lesson Study. In M. K. Mhlolo, S. N. Matoti, & B. Fredericks (Eds.), SAARMSTE Book of Long Papers (pp. 2-14). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jehad-Alshwaikh/publication/312083661_Researchers_and_teachers_as_learners_in_Lesson_Study/links/58d527f2458515337857a616/Researchers-and-teachers-as-learners-in-Lesson-Study.pdf
  4. Arum, D. P., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Students’ logical-mathematical intelligence profile. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1), 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012071
  5. Aygor, N., & Ozdag, H. (2012). Misconceptions in linear algebra: the case of undergraduate students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2989-2994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.602
  6. Baidoo, J. (2019). Dealing with grade 10 learners’ misconceptions and errors when simplifying algebraic fractions. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 10(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/doi:10.10520/EJC-17aa794007
  7. Bethany, Y. (2016). 3 Types of math errors and how to prevent them. https://mathgeekmama.com/types-of-math-errors/
  8. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (2014). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
  9. Bohlmann, C. A., Prince, R. N., & Deacon, A. (2017). Mathematical errors made by high performing candidates writing the National Benchmark Tests. Pythagoras, 38(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v38i1.292
  10. Bray, & Santagata, W. (2013). How to leverage the potential of mathematical errors. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(7), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.19.7.0424
  11. Brown, J., & Skow, K. (2016). Mathematics: Identifying and adressing student errors. IRIS Center. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdf_case_studies/ics_matherr.pdf
  12. Chirume, S. (2017). A critical analysis of errors made by rural and urban students in ‘A’ level mathematics paper 1 (4008/1) in Shurugwi and Gweru Districts, Zimbabwe. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 5(2), 63-73. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aecb/4bd1a018ab169e60af4403032352cfe36897.pdf
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Inc.
  14. Dhlamini, Z, B., & Kibirige, I. (2014). Grade 9 learners’ errors and misconceptions in addition of fractions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 236-256. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p236
  15. Egodawatte, G. (2011). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in algebra. University of Toronto, Toronto.
  16. Elbrink, M. K. (2008). Analyzing and addressing common mathematical errors in secondary education. Ball State University, Cardinal Scholar. http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/1365327
  17. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Making time for feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 42-47. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/making-time-for-feedback
  18. Frame, R. (2018). What is SOLO taxonomy? https://edu.rsc.org/ideas/what-is-solo-taxonomy/3008902.article
  19. Fumador, E. S., & Agyei, D. D. (2018). Students ‘errors and misconceptions in algebra: Exploring the impact of remedy using diagnostic conflict and conventional teaching approaches. U. o. C. C. I. Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/8054
  20. Gardee, A., & Brodie, K. (2015). A teacher’s engagement with learner errors in her Grade 9 mathematics classroom : original research. Pythagoras, 36(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v36i2.293
  21. Gumpo, L. (2014). Grade 9 learners' strategies and errors in solving arithmetic and algebraic linear equations (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Science, School of Science Education).
  22. Iddrisu, M. M., Abukari, A., & Boakye, S. (2017). Some common misconstructions and misinterpretations in basic algebra: A case of students of university for development studies and Navrongo senior high school in Ghana. British Journal of Education, 5(9), 22-35.
  23. Jacobs, M., Mhakure, D., Fray, R. L., Holtman, L., & Julie, C. (2014). Item difficulty analysis of a high-stakes mathematics examination using Rasch analysis. Pythagoras, 35(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v35i1.220
  24. Kakoma, L., & Makonye, P. J. (2010). Learners and misconceptions in elementary analysis: A case study of a Grade 12 class in South Africa. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(3), 35-46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056125.pdf
  25. Koch, M. A. (2014). The relationship between peer coaching, collaboration and collegiality, teacher effectiveness and leadership (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  26. Lian, L. H., & Yew, W. T. (2012). Assessing algebraic solving ability: A theoretical framework. International Education Studies, 5(6), 177-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p177
  27. Luneta, K., & Makonye, P. J. (2010). Learner Errors and Misconceptions in Elementary Analysis: A Case Study of a Grade 12 Class in South Africa. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(3), 35-46.
  28. Makonye, J. P. (2011). Learner errors in introductory differentiation tasks: A study of learner misconceptions in the National Senior Certificate examinations. University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa.
  29. Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, J. (2016). A study of errors and misconceptions in the learning of addition and subtraction of directed numbers in grade 8. SAGE Open, 6(4), 2158244016671375. https://doi.org/2158244016671375
  30. Makonye, J., & Hantibi, N. (2014). Exploration of grade 9 learners’ errors on operations with directed numbers. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 1564-1572. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p1564
  31. Malahlela, M. V. (2017). Using errors and misconceptions as a resource to teach functions to grade 11 learners. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  32. Mashazi, S. (2014). Learners’ explanations of the errors they make in introductory algebra. In U. o. Witwatersrand (Ed.), Wits Mathts Connect secondary project, School of education.
  33. Mbewe, T. L. (2013). Misconceptions and errors in Algebra at grade 11 levels: The case of two selected secondary schools in Petauke District Zambia.
  34. Mdaka, B. R. (2011). Learners’ errors and misconceptions associated with common fractions. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
  35. Mulungye, M. M., O’Connor, M., & Ndethiu, S. (2016). Sources of student errors and misconceptions in algebra and effectiveness of classroom practice remediation in Machakos County-Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(10), 31-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099568.pdf
  36. Na’imah, S., Sulandra, M., & Rahardi, R. (2018). Kemampuan siswa field dependent level multistructural dalam menyelesaikan soal pythagoras dan pemberian scaffolding [Ability of multistructural level field dependent students in solving pythagorean problems and scaffolding]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(6), 788-798. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11234
  37. Ncube, M. (2016). Analysis of errors made by learners in simplifying algebraic expressions at grade 9 level. University of South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23199
  38. Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils’ errors on written mathematical tasks. In M. A. C. J. Foyster (Ed.), Research in Mathematics Education in Australia (Vol. 2, pp. 269-287). Swinburne College Press.
  39. Pournara, C. (2020). Grade 9 learners’ algebra performance: Comparisons across quintiles, insights from errors and curriculum implications. South African Journal of Science, 116, 1-7. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532020000600011&nrm=iso
  40. Rahim, R. A., Noor, N. M., & Zaid, N. M. (2015). Meta-analysis on element of cognitive conflict strategies with a focus on multimedia learning material development. International Education Studies, 8(13), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p73
  41. Sarımanoğlu, N. U. (2019). The investigation of middle school students’ misconceptions about algebraic equations. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 3(1), 1-22.
  42. Seng, L. K. (2010). An error analysis of Form 2 (Grade 7) students in simplifying algebraic expressions: A descriptive study. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 8(20), 139-162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i20.1398
  43. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational studies in mathematics, 22(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
  44. Tiwari, C., & Fatima, R. (2019). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in algebra concept. Mahatma Gandhi Central University Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 22-33. https://mgcub.ac.in/pdf/journals/mgcujss_1-1_april-september_2019-32-43.pdf
  45. Ung, H. Q., Phan, M. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Nakagawa, M. (2019). Strategy and tools for collecting and annotating handwritten descriptive answers for developing automatic and semi-automatic marking-an initial effort to math. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition Workshops (ICDARW) (Vol. 2, pp. 13-18). IEEE.