Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2114 Download : 1191

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has forced an immediate transition from face-to-face learning in classrooms to online learning, including math learning. Mathematics with abstract working objects is not easy to learn online. So, an excellent self-regulated learning ability is required. So far, many efforts have been made to improve self-regulated learning in mathematics learning. However, there are still gaps in improving students' self-regulated learning ability in online mathematics learning, especially in relation to the integration of GeoGebra into the Flipped Learning approach. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of integrating GeoGebra into the Flipped Learning approach to improve students' self-regulated learning ability in learning mathematics online during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest control group design to compare the effectiveness of a GeoGebra-integrated Flipped Learning approach. A conventional Flipped Learning approach and a conventional learning approach increase students' self-regulated learning level in constructing their understanding of mathematical concepts during online learning in the Covid-19 pandemic. The study involved 60 students randomly selected from one of Indonesia's private universities. They were divided into three groups representing each approach. Pretest and posttest results were quantitatively analyzed using Normalized Gain (N-Gain) Score, Cohen's d effect size, and statistical descriptive. The analysis results revealed that GeoGebra-integrated Flipped Learning is more effective in increasing students' self-regulated learning level in online mathematics learning than the other two approaches. It is expected that the results of this study can provide insights into alternative solutions for improving the quality of online mathematics learning by increasing the level of self-regulated learning of students.

Keywords

GeoGebra Flipped Learning Aiken's Coefficient Value Covid-19 Self-Regulated Learning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Waluyo, M., Prayitno, H. J., & Hanifah, M. (2022). Integrating GeoGebra into the flipped learning approach to improve students’ self-regulated learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp69-86
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar.” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9
  2. Agra, G., Formiga, N. S., Oliveira, P. S. de, Costa, M. M. L., Fernandes, M. das G. M., & Nóbrega, M. M. L. da. (2019). Analysis of the concept of Meaningful Learning in light of the Ausubel’s Theory. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72(1), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0691
  3. Albano, G., & Dello Iacono, U. (2019). GeoGebra in e-learning environments: a possible integration in mathematics and beyond. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(11), 4331–4343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1111-x
  4. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  5. Asmar, A., & Delyana, H. (2020). Hubungan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Penggunaan Software Geogebra. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2758
  6. Bao, L. (2006). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. American Journal of Physics, 74(10), 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2213632
  7. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016/B13/S03.043
  8. Borwein, J., & Bailey, D. (2008). Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in The 21st Century. In Mathematics by Experiment. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10704
  9. Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of Time-Management Practices on College Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405
  10. Cho, M. H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
  11. Chyr, W.-L., Shen, P.-D., Chiang, Y.-C., Lin, J.-B., & Tsia, C.-W. (2017). Exploring the Effects of Online Academic Help-Seeking and Flipped Learning on Improving Students. Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 1176–3647. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26196116
  12. Dahl, B. (2018). What is the problem in problem-based learning in higher education mathematics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1320354
  13. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  14. Ergen, T., & Kozat, S. S. (2018). Efficient online learning algorithms based on LSTM neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(8), 3772–3783. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2741598
  15. Fatahillah, A., Puspitasari, I. D., & Hussen, S. (2020). The development of Schoology web-based learning media with GeoGebra to improve the ICT literacy on quadratic functions. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.10692
  16. Ferguson, S. (2020). Online Mathematics Education, the Good, the Bad, and the General Overview. In Teaching and Learning Mathematics Online (1st Editio). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781351245586-25/online-mathematics-education-good-bad-general-overview-sarah-ferguson
  17. Fisher, M. J., & Marshall, A. P. (2009). Understanding descriptive statistics. Australian Critical Care, 22(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2008.11.003
  18. Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). What Is Flipped Learning ? The Four Pillars of F-L-I-P. In Flipped Learning Network. http://www.flippedlearning.org/definition
  19. Habibi, & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika , Soal Model PISA , dan Konteks Motif Batik Tulis Jahe Selawe. Jurnal Varidika, 33(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i2.16722
  20. Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on Mathematics and Spatial Visualization. Physics Education Research Conference, 8(August 2002), 1–14. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=10EI2q8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=10EI2q8AAAAJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C
  21. Halil, N. I. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using Edmodo as an Online Learning Platform in Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 4(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i3.316
  22. Hall, J., & Chamblee, G. (2013). Teaching Algebra and Geometry with GeoGebra: Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for Middle Grades/Secondary Mathematics Classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.764276
  23. Hidayati, D. W., & Kurniati, L. (2018). The Influence of Self Regulated Learning to Mathematics Critical Thinking Ability on 3D-Shapes Geometry Learning using Geogebra. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 7(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v7i1.2965
  24. Hong, J.-C., Lee, Y.-F., & Ye, J.-H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
  25. Irawan, A. W., Dwisona, D., & Lestari, M. (2020). Psychological impacts of students on online learning during the pandemic COVID-19. KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling (E-Journal), 7(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/kons.v7i1.6389
  26. Ishartono, N., Toyib, M., & Alam, A. (2019). Penggunaan Graf Pohon dalam Mengajarkan Konsep Mahram. Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 14(2), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v14i2.4575
  27. Juan, A. A., Steegmann, C., Huertas, A., Martinez, M. J., & Simosa, J. (2011). Teaching mathematics online in the European area of higher education: An instructor’s point of view. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.526254
  28. Judith, H., & Markus, H. (2008). Introduction to GeoGebra. Geogebra. www.geogebra.org%0A
  29. Kemendikbud. (2020). Mendikbud Terbitkan SE tentang Pelaksanaan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Covid-19. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/mendikbud-terbitkan-se-tentang-pelaksanaan-pendidikan-dalam-masa-darurat-covid19
  30. Kemensesneg RI. (2020). Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penanganan Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19). In Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367802820
  31. Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2000). The visibility of models: Using technology as a bridge between mathematics and engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073900287390
  32. Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
  33. Lackmann, S., Léger, P. M., Charland, P., Aubé, C., & Talbot, J. (2021). The influence of video format on engagement and performance in online learning. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020128
  34. Lailiyah, S., Hayat, S., Urifah, S., & Setyawati, M. (2021). Levels of students’ mathematics anxieties and the impacts on online mathematics learning. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.36437
  35. Larnell, G. V., Bullock, E. C., & Jett, C. C. (2016). Rethinking Teaching and Learning Mathematics for Social Justice from a Critical Race Perspective. Journal of Education, 196(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600104
  36. Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9298-z
  37. March, L., & Steadman, P. (2020). The geometry of environment: an introduction to spatial organization in design (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429343346
  38. Marchis, I. (2011). How Mathematics Teachers Develop Their Pupils’ Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 4(2/3), 9–14. http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=79184972&site=ehost-live
  39. Mensik, J. (2015). Mathematics and economics: the case of Menger. Journal of Economic Methodology, 22(4), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024881
  40. Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College Student’s Academic Stress and Its Relation to Their Anxiety, Time Management, and Leisure Satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 61(1), 41. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c2c1309ac42c1cc4b74e146f6b0e260c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=30166
  41. Mustakim, M. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring Menggunakan Media Online Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v2i1.13646
  42. Nisiyatussani, Ayuningtyas, V., Fathurrohman, M., & Anriani, N. (2018). GeoGebra applets design and development for junior high school students to learn quadrilateral mathematics concepts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4162.27-40
  43. Nurcahyo, A., Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Utami, N. S., Sari, C. K., & Aryuana, A. (2021). Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Geogebra Terintegrasi Google Classroom Bagi Guru-Guru Matematika SMA/SMK Muhammadiyah Kabupaten Klaten. Proceeding of The URECOL, 50–57. http://repository.urecol.org/index.php/proceeding/article/download/1260/1227
  44. Peng, C. Y. J., & Chen, L. T. (2014). Beyond cohen’s d: Alternative effect size measures for between-subject designs. Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745471
  45. Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., Hutchinson, L., Perry, N. E., & Hutchinson, L. (2015). Mentoring Student Teachers to Support Self-Regulated Learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/501485
  46. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding Self-Regulated Learning What Is Self-Regulated Learning? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956304
  47. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work ? A Review of the Research. Journal OfEngineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  48. Purpura, D. J., & Reid, E. E. (2016). Mathematics and language: Individual and group differences in mathematical language skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36(3rd Quarter), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.020
  49. Puspitasari, E., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Mathematical Spatial Ability Reviewed from Students’ Self-Confidence in the PBL Model with Teacher and Peer feedbacks Assisted by Geogebra. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research Elsa Puspitasari, 11(1), 62–69. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
  50. Qohar, A., & Sumarmo, U. (2013). Improving mathematical communication ability and self regulation learning of yunior high students by using reciprocal teaching. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.562.59-74
  51. Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving Content Validity of Self-Regulated learning Scale (The Comparison of Aiken Index and Expanded Gregory Index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
  52. Roehling, P. V. (2018). Flipping the College Classroom. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69392-7
  53. Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
  54. Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
  55. Subakri, & Annizar, A. M. (2021). The effects of covid-19 in learning: Effective and efficient online learning models of mathematical statistics and real analysis from the students’ perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012048
  56. Sukmawati, R. A., Pramita, M., Purba, H. S., & Utami, B. (2020). The Use of Blended Cooperative Learning Model in Introduction to Digital Systems Learning. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 2(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v2i2.9263
  57. Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. Internet and Higher Education, 36(May 2016), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003
  58. Thanheiser, E., & Sugimoto, A. (2020). Mathematics to Understand and Critique the World: Reconceiving Mathematics in a Mathematics Content Course for Elementary School Teachers. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 12(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1768761
  59. Ulum, M. I. (2016). Strategi Self-Regulated Learning untuk Menurunkan Tingkat Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 3(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v3i2.1107
  60. van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers and Education, 158(July), 104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000
  61. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation. In Domain-Specific Models and Research on Self-Regulation (pp. 531–566). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50045-7Get
  62. World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19): situation report 162. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/20200630-covid-19-sitrep-162.pdf?sfvrsn=e00a5466_2
  63. Zetriuslita, Nofriyandi, & Istikomah, E. (2020). The Increasing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated through GeoGebra Based Teaching reviewed from Initial Mathematical Ability (IMA) Level. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14135A
  64. Zimmerman, B. (1990). Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501
  65. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attening self-regulation A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
  66. Zimmerman, B. J., Moylan, A., Hudesman, J., White, N., & Flugman, B. (2011). Enhancing self-reflection and mathematics achievement of at-risk urban technical college students. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(1), 141–160. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-13343-007