Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 544 Download : 320

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Monotonous mathematics learning focusing on textbooks only will make students bored and feel that studying mathematics is useless. Using attractive and meaningful approaches, like STEAM and Quranic approaches, is strongly motivated by the need to avoid tedious drilling for students in learning mathematics. This study aims to assess students' perceptions of the development of mathematics modules using science, technology, engineering, and art (STEAM) and AL-Quran approaches. The research approach employed in this research is embedded in mixed methods. Quantitative data was examined using percentages, while qualitative data were transcribed and then developed into codes, categories, and themes. The study recruited 146 Pidie senior high school students in the natural science stream, and five individuals were selected for one-to-one semi-structured interviews. The results of this study show that students have a negative experience in learning mathematics. However, they have a significant interest in integrated math learning with Quranic and STEAM approaches. Furthermore, they believe the modules are one learning medium ideal for mathematics. Finally, based on this study, mathematics teachers should be able to develop learning modules that can integrate STEAM approaches and the understanding of the Quran for senior high school students.

Keywords

Learning Mathematics Mathematics Modules Quranic Approach STEAM Approach Students' Perceptions

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muzakkir, Zulnaidi, H. ., & Abd Rauf , R. A. . (2024). Mathematics module based on STEAM and Quranic approach: A study for student’s perception. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp363-384
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdussakir, & Rosimanidar. (2017). Model integrasi matematika dan Al-Quran serta praktik pembelajarannya [Model of integration of mathematics and the Quran and its learning practices]. Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika di dalam Al-Quran, April, 1–16.
  2. Agusta, E. S. (2020). Peningkatan kemampuan matematis siswa melalui pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik [Improving students' mathematical abilities through a realistic mathematics education approach]. ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v2i2.17819
  3. Agustina, A. (2018). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa kelas vii dalam penerapan model penemuan terbimbing [Mathematics concept understanding ability of seventh-grade students in the application of guided discovery model]. Jurnal LEMMA, 5(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2018.v5i1.3006
  4. Akhter, N., & Akhter, N. (2018). Learning in mathematics: Difficulties and perceptions of students evaluation of distance teacher education in Pakistan view project. Journal of Educational Research, Dept. of Education, IUB, Pakistan, 21(1), 147–163. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328772457
  5. Akhwani, & Romdloni, M. (2021). Pendidikan karakter masa pandemi Covid-19 di SD [Character education during the Covid-19 pandemic in elementary schools]. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 1–12. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJPE/index
  6. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1991). The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philosophy of Education. International Institute of Islam Thught and Civilization.
  7. Ansari, A., & Qomarudin, A. (2021). Konsep pendidikan islam menurut Ibnu Sina dan Ibnu Qayyim Al Jauziyyah [The concept of islamic education according to Ibn Sina and Ibn Qayyim Al Jauziyyah]. Islamika, 3(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v3i2.1222
  8. Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., Pramudya, Y., & Raharjo, W. (2020). The impact of the use of STEM education approach on the blended learning to improve student’s critical thinking skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3 B), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081503
  9. Ar-Rahmany, M. (2022). Ulama dan Dayah dalam nomeglatur masyarakat Aceh [Ulama and Dayah in the nomeglature of Acehnese society]. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(12), 4101–4122. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i12.1509
  10. Astalini., Darmaji., Kurniawan, D. A., Chen, D., Fitriani, R., Wulandari, M., Maryani, S., Simamora, N. N., & Ramadhanti, A. (2022). A study for student perception of mathematical physics e-module based on gender. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 911–936. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.156
  11. Aziz, M. D. A., & Rahmat, A. (2023). Internalization process of religious moderation values in improving student Islamic character. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 16, 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2023-0000091
  12. Balgan, A., Renchin, T., & Ojgoosh, K. (2022). An experiment in applying differentiated instruction in STEAM disciplines. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2022(98), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.98.02
  13. Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2
  14. Bhagat, K. K., Yang, F. Y., Cheng, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Liou, W. K. (2021). Tracking the process and motivation of math learning with augmented reality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3153–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10066-9
  15. Blanco, T. F., Gorgal-Romarís, A., Núñez-García, C., & Sequeiros, P. G. (2022). Digital Education to Approach the Affective Domain in Mathematics Learning. In Inclusive Digital Education (pp. 47-69). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  16. Brouwer, N., Joling, E., & Kaper, W. (2022). Effect of a person-centred, tailor-made, teaching practice-oriented training programme on continuous professional development of STEM lecturers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103848
  17. Caia, J., Thornton, H. R., Kelly, V. G., Scott, T. J., Halson, S. L., Cupples, B., & Driller, M. W. (2018). Does self-perceived sleep reflect sleep estimated via activity monitors in professional rugby league athletes? Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(13), 1492–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1398885
  18. Chung, C. C., Huang, S. L., Cheng, Y. M., & Lou, S. J. (2022). Using an iSTEAM project-based learning model for technology senior high school students: Design, development, and evaluation. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 32, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09643-5
  19. Chung, S. K., & Li, D. (2021). Issues-based steam education: A case study in a Hong Kong secondary school. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 22(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea22n3
  20. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.worldcat.org/title/research-design-qualitative-quantitative-and-mixed-methods-approaches/oclc/269313109
  21. Creswel, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed, Vol. 59). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  22. Demo, H., Garzetti, M., Santi, G., & Tarini, G. (2021). Learning mathematics in an inclusive and open environment: An interdisciplinary approach. Education Sciences, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050199
  23. Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 8 Juli 2003, 1–26.
  24. Diego-Mantecon, J. M., Prodromou, T., Lavicza, Z., Blanco, T. F., & Ortiz-Laso, Z. (2021). An attempt to evaluate STEAM project-based instruction from a school mathematics perspective. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01303-9
  25. Duo-Terron, P., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & López-Núñez, J. A. (2022). STEAM in primary education: Impact on linguistic and mathematical competences in a disadvantaged context. Frontiers in Education, 7(June), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.792656
  26. Fernández-Cézar, R., Solano-Pinto, N., & Garrido, D. (2021). Can mathematics achievement be predicted? The role of cognitive–behavioral–emotional variables. Mathematics, 9(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9141591
  27. Fritz, A., Haase, V. G., & Räsänen, P. (2019). International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: From the laboratory to the classroom. In International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties: From the Laboratory to the Classroom (Issue June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3
  28. Garcia-Piqueras, M., & Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R. (2021). Green stem to improve mathematics proficiency: ESA mission space lab. Mathematics, 9(17), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172066
  29. Gistituati, N., & Atikah, N. (2022). E-module based on RME approach in improving the mathematical communication skills of elementary students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42314
  30. Handayani, E. T. Y., Nursetiawati, S., & Mahdiyah. (2020). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran sanggul modern [Development of a modern bun learning module]. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 6(3), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3360401
  31. Hartoyo, A., Nursangaji, A., & Suratman, D. (2019). Pengembangan kompetensi sikap dalam pembelajaran matematika secara holistik bersumber Qur’an [Developing attitudinal competencies in learning mathematics holistically from the Qur'an]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 10(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v10i1.30033
  32. Herbert, B., Fischer, J., & Klieme, E. (2022). How valid are student perceptions of teaching quality across education systems? Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101652
  33. Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Ginanjar, A., & Putri, R. I. I. (2022). An ePub learning module and students’ mathematical reasoning ability: A development study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp103-118
  34. Huang, F. (2020). Effects of the application of steam education on students’ learning attitude and outcome-fujian chuanzheng communications college. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 69, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.69.23
  35. Idris, M. (2022). Syariat Islam dan tradisi di Aceh Darussalam [Islamic law and tradition in Aceh Darussalam]. Jurnal Sosial, Politik dan Budaya (SOSPOLBUD), 1(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.55927/sospolbud.v1i1.458
  36. Insorio, A. O., & Macandog, D. M. (2022). Video lessons via YouTube channel as mathematics interventions in modular distance learning. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), ep22001. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11468
  37. Ismail, M. H., Fadzil, H. M., Saat, R. M., & Salleh, M. F. M. (2022). A needs analysis study for the preparation of integrated STEM instructional practices through Scientist-Teacher-Student Partnership (STSP). ASM Science Journal, 17. https://doi.org/10.32802/ASMSCJ.2022.1112
  38. Jäder, J., Lithner, J., & Sidenvall, J. (2020). Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656826
  39. Jiang, T., & Li, S. (2023). Secondary school students’ use and perceptions of textbooks in mathematics learning: A large-scale investigation in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132184
  40. Kemdikbud. (2019). Ringkasan eksekutif hasil ujian nasional 2019 masukan untuk pembelajaran di sekolah SMA/MA [Executive summary of national exam results 2019 input for learning in senior high schools]. Puspendik Balitbang Kemdikbud.
  41. Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kebijakan Kurikulum untuk Membantu Pemulihan Pembelajaran [Curriculum Policies to Aid Learning Recovery]. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi, 15. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1r2vwr6eB9-9pRxc6y04d0oqai62CiEYf/view
  42. Kristanto, Y. D., & Santoso, E. B. (2020). Towards a mathematics textbook for supporting 21st century learning: The student perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012037
  43. Kusmaryono, I., & Basir, M. A. (2020). Interaction Patterns of Teachers and Students in the Learning Scaffolding Process: Reviews in the Al Quran Surah'Abasa verses 1-10. In ICIC 2020: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Islamic Civilization, ICIC 2020, 27th August 2020, Semarang, Indonesia (p. 404). European Alliance for Innovation.
  44. Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(44). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
  45. Lin, C. L., & Tsai, C. Y. (2021). The effect of a pedagogical STEAM model on students’ project competence and learning motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x
  46. Louie, N. (2020). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664
  47. Lupi, J. B., Carvalho de Abreu, D. C., Ferreira, M. C., Oliveira, R. D. R. de, & Chaves, T. C. (2017). Brazilian Portuguese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR-Br): cross-cultural validation, reliability, and construct and structural validation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(16), 1650–1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1207106
  48. Mardiyah., Johar, R., & Mailizar. (2020). The development of trigonometry e-modules for senior high school using Differentiated Instruction (DI) approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012017
  49. Mora-Luis, C. E., & Martin-Gutierrez, J. (2020). The change of educational processes learning and teaching in engineering education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), 116034. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116034
  50. Muslimin, Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Aisyah, N. (2020). Learning integers with realistic mathematics education approach based on islamic values. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11721.363-384
  51. Muthia, C., Effendi, R., & HMZ, N. (2021). Nilai-nilai agama islam dalam budaya dan adat masyarakat Aceh [Islamic values in Acehnese culture and customs]. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, 1(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrkpi.v1i1.170
  52. Nu’man, M. (2019). Self awareness siswa madrasah aliyah dalam pembelajaran matematika [Self awareness of madrasah aliyah students in learning mathematics]. Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.2019.011-06
  53. OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. OECD, 1–10. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii_bd69f805-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org//sites/bd69f805-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/bd69f805-en#fig86
  54. Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z
  55. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with Realistic Mathematical Education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0768-4
  56. Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012). Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012, 7513 LNCS, 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35606-3_38
  57. Peraturan Gubernur Aceh. (2022). Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2022.
  58. Plano Clark, V. L., Schumacher, K., West, C., Edrington, J., Dunn, L. B., Harzstark, A., Melisko, M., Rabow, M. W., Swift, P. S., & Miaskowski, C. (2013). Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812474372
  59. Powell, S. R., Lembke, E. S., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Petscher, Y., Hwang, J., Bos, S. E., Cox, T., Hirt, S., Mason, E. N., Pruitt-Britton, T., Thomas, E., & Hopkins, S. (2021). Data-based individualization in mathematics to support middleschool teachers and their students with mathematics learning difficulty. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69(June 2020), 100897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100897
  60. Pujiastuti, H., Utami, R. R., & Haryadi, R. (2020). The development of interactive mathematics learning media based on local wisdom and 21st century skills: Social arithmetic concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032019
  61. Ramli, A. A., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2017). Q-STEM Module Promotes Al-Quran Appreciation in Teaching STEM. Proceedings - 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2017- In Conjunction with: 7th Regional Conference on Engineering Education and Research in Higher Education 2017, RCEE and RHEd 2017, 1st International STEAM Education Conference, STEAMEC 201, 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8466968
  62. Riduwan. (2012). Belajar mudah penelitian untuk guru-karyawan dan peneliti pemula [Easy research learning for teacher-employees and early career researchers]. Alfabeta.
  63. Setyaningsih, N., & Utami, D. P. (2021). The implementation of the discovery model based on numbered head together reviewed from students’ cognitive style in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1), 012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012109
  64. Shcherbatykh, S. V., & Lykova, K. G. (2022). Improving the efficiency of mathematics education through the development of a stochastic worldview of students. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15258a
  65. Soedjadi, R. (2000). Kiat belajar matematika di Indonesia [Tips for learning math in Indonesia]. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
  66. Sudargini, Y., & Purwanto, A. (2020). The effect of teachers pedagogic competency on the learning outcomes of students. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 1(4), 2722–8878. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar
  67. Suradi, & Djam’An, N. (2021). The effectiveness of the PIPEK model (concept map-based interactive learning) in learning modern algebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 012139. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012139
  68. Sutama, Prayitno, H. J., Ishartono, N., & Sari, D. P. (2020). Development of mathematics learning process by using flipped classroom integrated by STEAM education in senior high school. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3690–3697. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080848
  69. Taufikurrahman, T., Budiyono, & Slamet, I. (2021). Development of mathematics module based on meaningful learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043239
  70. Tran, N., Huang, C., Hsiao, K., Lin, K., & Hung, J. (2021). Investigation on the influences of STEAM-based curriculum on scientific creativity of elementary school students. Frontiers in Education, 6(October), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.694516
  71. Ulia, N., Sari, Y., Yustiana, S., & Hariyono, M. (2020). The influence of mathematical basic concept of materials based on internalization of Islamic values against religious attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1517(1), 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012060
  72. Vitrianingsih, D., Aulianingsih, I., & Yuliani, H. (2021). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan modul elektronik (e-module) IPA terintegrasi Islam [Analysis of the needs for the development of electronic modules (e-modules) of science integrated with Islam]. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i1.2525
  73. Wang, Y., & Fan, L. (2021). Investigating students’ perceptions concerning textbook use in mathematics: A comparative study of secondary schools between Shanghai and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(5), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1941265
  74. Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: a conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689–5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w
  75. Wu, H., & Leung, S. O. (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales?—A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775
  76. Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STEAM - A brief overview. STEAM: A framework for teaching across the disciplines. STEAM Education, 7(9), 1–9. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Georgette-Yakman-2/publication/327449281_What_is_the_point_of_STEAM-A_Brief_Overview/links/5b901b98a6fdcce8a4c2f290/What-is-the-point-of-STEAM-A-Brief-Overview.pdf