Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 448 Download : 304

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the widespread adoption of distance learning, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of how teacher knowledge evolves within the context of Teacher Professional Education (TPE) programs. Some research endeavors may employ evaluation methodologies that inadequately capture the nuanced dimensions of knowledge, highlighting the necessity for greater incorporation of evidence-based approaches in the formulation and assessment of teacher development initiatives. This study employs a qualitative methodology to explore the evolution of Mathematics Teachers' Specialized Knowledge (MTSK) within the framework of a TPE program. Data were gathered through the engagement of three educators in the preparation and execution of lessons on permutation and combination via a Learning Management System (LMS), coupled with in-depth interviews. The findings underscore the TPE program's role in fostering collaborative learning environments through participation in online educational communities. Teachers are shown to be increasingly integrating technology into their pedagogical practices, albeit with varying degrees of proficiency. The presence of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) is identified as instrumental in supporting educators in refining instructional strategies to enhance teaching effectiveness. Nevertheless, there remains a subset of teachers necessitating more profound and more comprehensive content knowledge about their subject matter. These insights emphasize the importance of designing TPE programs that offer sustained and adaptable professional development opportunities to facilitate continuous growth among educators. Consequently, it is recommended that online learning communities geared toward addressing the diverse learning requirements of students be established, thereby aiding in the identification and resolution of pedagogical challenges.

Keywords

Mathematics Teachers Specialized Knowledge Permutation and Combination Professionalism Development Teacher Profession Education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Matitaputty, C., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., & Sukoriyanto. (2024). How mathematics teachers’ special knowledge changing: A case study in the Professional Teacher Education program. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 545–574. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp545-574
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Auslander, S. S., Bingham, G. E., Tanguay, C. L., & Fuentes, D. S. (2023). Developing elementary mathematics specialists as teacher leaders during a preparation program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09582-7
  2. Bertram, A. (2014). ‘CoRes and PaP-eRs as a strategy for helping beginning primary teachers develop their pedagogical content knowledge. Educación Química, 25(3), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(14)70545-2
  3. Campbell, M. P., & Lee, H. S. (2017). Examining Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Opportunities to Develop Mathematically in Professional Learning Communities. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3–4), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12209
  4. Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar-González, Á., Ribeiro, M., & Muñoz-Catalán, M. C. (2018). The mathematics teacher’s specialised knowledge (MTSK) model*. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981
  5. Carrillo, J., Climent, N., Contreras, L. C., & Montes, M. Á. (2019). Mathematics Teachers’ Specialised Knowledge in Managing Problem-Solving Classroom Tasks. In P. Felmer, P. Liljedahl, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Problem Solving in Mathematics Instruction and Teacher Professional Development (pp. 297–316). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29215-7_16
  6. Chauraya, M., & Brodie, K. (2017). Learning in professional learning communities: Shifts in mathematics teachers’ practices. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2017.1350531
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. SAGE Publication. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1
  8. Department of Education and Training. (2022). Using FISO 2.0 to plan school improvement. Department of Education and Training. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/PAL/fiso-2.0-plan-for-school-improvement.pdf
  9. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th ed. (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  10. Graham, P. (2007). Improving Teacher Effectiveness through Structured Collaboration: A Case Study of a Professional Learning Community. RMLE Online, 31(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2007.11462044
  11. Harvey, F., & Teledahl, A. (2022). Characteristics of Professional Learning Communities in Mathematics: A Systematic Review. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 24(1), 72–95.
  12. Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2016). Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons. Language and education, 30(5), 400-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1125363
  13. Ivars, P., Fernandéz, C., & Llinares, S. (2017). How students looking for teachers look at the teaching of mathematics in a structured way write narratives. Mathematics and Its Teaching, 24(1), 79–96.
  14. Jatmiko, M. A., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). Students’ Learning Obstacles and Alternative Solution in Counting Rules Learning Levels Senior High School. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16716
  15. Kapur, J. . (1970). Combinatorial Analysis and School Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381598
  16. Kemendikbudristek BSKAP. (2022). Keputusan Kepala BSKAP Nomor 033/H/KR/2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Keputusan Kepala BSKAP Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 Tentang Capaian Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Jenjang Pendididikan. Kemendikbudristek. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/033_H_KR_2022-Salinan-SK-Kabadan-tentang-Perubahan-SK-008-tentang-Capaian-Pembelajaran.pdf
  17. Kirwan, J. V., Winsor, M. S., & Barker, D. D. (2023). Mathematics instructor actions and knowledge integration: utilizing resources in mathematics courses for teachers. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(4), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01502-6
  18. König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., née Nehls, C. F., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0
  19. Kusumah, Y. S., & Nurhasanah, F. (2017). The Endless Long-Term Program of Mathematics Teacher Professional Development in Indonesia. In B. Kaur, O. N. Kwon, & Y. H. LEong (Eds.), Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers An Asian Perspective (pp. 33–45). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2598-3_3
  20. Lamanna, L., Gea, M. M., & Batanero, C. (2022a). Do Secondary School Students’ Strategies in Solving Permutation and Combination Problems Change with Instruction? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00228-z
  21. Lamanna, L., Gea, M. M., & Batanero, C. (2022b). Secondary school students ’ strategies in solving combination problems. In Bozen-Bolzano (Ed.), Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12) (p. hal-03751834).
  22. Lavidas, K., Apostolou, Z., & Papadakis, S. (2022). Challenges and Opportunities of Mathematics in Digital Times: Preschool Teachers’ Views. Education Sciences, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070459
  23. Little, M. E. (2020). Collaboration and Connections among Middle School Teachers of Mathematics: Enhancing Efficacy through Professional Learning Communities. SRATE Journal, 29(1), 1–8.
  24. Lockwood, E. (2019). Using a computational context to investigate student reasoning about whether “order matters” in counting problems. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education.
  25. Lockwood, E., A. Swinyard, C., & S. Caughman, J. (2015). Patterns, Sets of Outcomes, and Combinatorial Justification: Two Students’ Reinvention of Counting Formulas. In International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0001-2
  26. Lockwood, E., Wasserman, N. H., & Tillema, E. S. (2020). A Case for combinatorics: A research commentary. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59(100783). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100783
  27. Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (9th Edition). In Pearson Education Limited (Ninth edit). Pearson Education Limited.
  28. Masina, J. E., & Mbokazi, M. S. (2023). Mentoring for Developing Teachers’ Specialised Knowledge of Mathematics Pre- Service Teachers at the Intermediate Phase. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(3), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i3.1099
  29. Matitaputty, C., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., & Sukoriyanto. (2022). Examining the pedagogical content knowledge of in-service mathematics teachers on the permutations and combinations in the context of student mistakes. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp393-414
  30. McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers and Education, 123, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008
  31. Muhazir, A., & Retnawati, H. (2020). The teachers’ obstacles in implementing technology in mathematics learning classes in the digital era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012022
  32. NCTM. (2000). Principles Standards and for School Mathematics. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  33. Nopriana, T., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2023). Combinatorics problems for undergraduate students: Identification of epistemological obstacles and model of combinatorial thinking. The 2nd National Conference on Mathematics Education (NACOME) 2021: Mathematical Proof as a Tool for Learning Mathematic, AIP Conf. Proc. 2811, 020021. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142261
  34. Nurlaily, V. A., Soegiyanto, H., & Usodo, B. (2019). Elementary school teacher’s obstacles in the implementation of problem-based learning model in mathematics learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5386.229-238
  35. Nzaramyimana, E., & Umugiraneza, O. (2023). Investigating teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge in teaching mathematics in Rwanda secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12403-2
  36. Permendikbudristek. (2022). Peraturan Meteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Tentang Standar Pendidikan Guru. In Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/detail_peraturan?main.
  37. Picado-Alfar, M., Loría-Fernández, J. R., & Espinoza-González, J. (2022). Teacher Reflection on a Teaching-Learning Situation Regarding the Concept of Relation in Secondary Education. Uniciencia, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.36-1.2
  38. Revina, S., Pramana, R. P., Fillaili, R., & Suryadarma, D. (2020). Sytematic Constraints Facing Teacher Professional Development in a Middle-Income Country: Indonesia’s Experience Over Four Decades. RISE Working Paper Series. 20/054, October, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2020/054
  39. Sandefur, J., Lockwood, E., Hart, E., & Greefrath, G. (2022). Teaching and Learning Discrete Mathematics. ZDM-Mathematics Education, https://do. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_51
  40. Scheiner, T., Montes, M. A., Godino, J. D., Carrillo, J., & Pino-Fan, L. R. (2019). What Makes Mathematics Teacher Knowledge Specialized? Offering Alternative Views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9859-6
  41. Sigurdardóttir, A. K. (2010). Professional learning community in relation to school effectiveness. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2010.508904
  42. Soto, O., Siy, K., & Harel, G. (2022). Promoting a set-oriented way of thinking in a U.S. High School discrete mathematics class: a case study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01337-7
  43. Sukoriyanto, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016). Students’ Errors in Solving the Permutation and Combination Problems Based on Problem Solving Steps of Polya. International Education Studies, 9(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p11
  44. Tam, A. C. F. (2015). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928122
  45. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2007). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning $. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  46. White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
  47. Widjaja, W. (2013). The use of contextual problems to support mathematical learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.413.151-159
  48. Yunianto, W., Indra Prahmana, R. C., & Crisan, C. (2021). Indonesian mathematics teachers’ knowledge of content and students of area and perimeter of rectangle. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13537.223-238
  49. Yusrina, A., Bima, L., Berkhout, E., & Suryadarma, D. (2022). Selecting Teachers in Indonesia : Predicting Teacher Performance Using Pre-employment Information. Riseprogramme.Org, May. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISEWP_2022/098