Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 106 Download : 6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between students' perceptions, interests, and engagement in mathematics within the cultural framework of K-12 education in Kazakhstan. A diverse sample of K-12 students representing various grade levels and community settings was included in the research. The analysis proceeded in three distinct phases: first, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to evaluate the reliability of the instrument; second, a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach was applied to examine relationships between variables and assess the overall model fit; and finally, descriptive and inferential statistical methods were employed. Students perceived mathematical abilities and interests were identified as significant predictors of their attitudes toward mathematics teachers, as revealed through SEM. Due to the nature of the data, nonparametric tests were utilized to explore group differences. The findings indicated a consistent pattern of negative student perceptions regarding their mathematical abilities and interests, juxtaposed with positive attitudes toward their mathematics teachers. These positive attitudes were more closely associated with students' personal rapport with teachers rather than their instructional effectiveness. Further analyses examined variations in perceptions across different grade levels and community settings, revealing the influence of contextual factors. Notably, no significant gender differences were observed, challenging existing literature on gender disparities in education. The study underscores the importance of adopting holistic educational strategies that account for cultural contexts and promote teacher-student solid relationships.

Keywords

Math Engagement Math Interests Perceived Abilities Teacher-Student Relationships

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Zhumabay, N., Balta, N., Zhadrayeva, L., Yilmaz, S., & Nadelson, L. S. (2024). Exploring the triad of mathematical engagement: Perceived abilities, interests, and teacher-student dynamics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1053–1076. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1053-1076
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Admiraal, W., Post, L., Lockhorst, D., Louws, M., & Kester, L. (2020). Personalizing learning with mobile technology in a secondary school in the Netherlands: Effects on students' autonomy support, learning motivation and achievement. European Educational Researcher, 3(3), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.333
  2. Anaya, L., Stafford, F., & Zamarro, G. (2022). Gender gaps in math performance, perceived mathematical ability and college STEM education: The role of parental occupation. Education Economics, 30(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2021.1974344
  3. Awang, Z. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modelling. Bandar Baru Bangi, MPWS Rich Resources.
  4. Balta, N., Japashov, N., Karimova, A., Agaidarova, S., Abisheva, S., & Potvin, P. (2023, May). Middle and high school girls' attitude to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics career interest across grade levels and school types. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1158041. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1158041
  5. Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 237-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90012-7
  6. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  7. Bature, I. J., Atweh, B., & Oreoluwa, F. (2020). Investigating the perception of senior secondary school students on the role of classroom engagement in mathematics problem solving. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(2), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.323
  8. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860-1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107
  9. Bernardo, A. B. I., Ganotice, F. A., Jr., & King, R. B. (2015). Motivation gap and achievement gap between public and private high schools in the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 657-667. https://doi.org/10.007/s40299-014-0213-2
  10. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
  11. Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67(3) 199-215. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112791
  12. Chen, X. (2022). The effects of individual-and class-level achievement on attitudes towards mathematics: An analysis of Hong Kong students using TIMSS 2019. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72, 101113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101113
  13. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2020). Indicators of middle school students' mathematics enjoyment and confidence. School Science and Mathematics, 120(8), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12439
  14. Crombie, G., Sinclair, N., Silverthorn, N., Byrne, B. M., DuBois, D. L., & Trinneer, A. (2005). Predictors of young adolescents' math grades and course enrollment intentions: Gender similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 52(5-6), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2678-1
  15. Dweck, C. S. (2007). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-004
  16. Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1992). Summer setback: Race, poverty, school composition, and mathematics achievement in the first two years of school. American Sociological Review, 57(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096145
  17. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519
  18. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Dicke, A. L., & Goetz, T. (2012). Beyond quantitative decline: conceptual shifts in adolescents' development of interest in mathematics. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026895
  19. Gallucci, M., & Jentschke, S. (2021). SEMLj: jamovi SEM Analysis. [jamovi module].
  20. Gur, T., Balta, N., Dauletkulova, A., Assanbayeva, G., & Fernández-Cézar, R. (2023). Mathematics achievement emotions of high school students in Kazakhstan. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp525-544
  21. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
  22. Hajovsky, D. B., Mason, B. A., & McCune, L. A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences. Journal of School Psychology, 63(4), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.001
  23. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  24. Harrington, D. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195339888.001.0001
  25. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1999). Changes in the black-white gap in achievement test scores. Sociology of Education, 72(2), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673179
  26. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455
  27. Howley, C. B., Howley, A. A., & Huber, D. S. (2005). Prescriptions for rural mathematics instruction: Analysis of the rhetorical literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(7), 1-16. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/20-7.pdf
  28. Hudson, R. A., Houck, E. A., & Estrada, P. (2020). Rural school mathematics education: Perspectives on curriculum and instruction. In Rural education research in the United States: State of the science and emerging directions (pp. 81-97). Springer.
  29. Istenic Starčič, A., Cotic, M., Solomonides, I., & Volk, M. (2016). Engaging preservice primary and preprimary school teachers in digital storytelling for the teaching and learning of mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12253
  30. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421
  31. Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-6. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
  32. Karasel, N., Ayda, O., & Tezer, M. (2010). The relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematical problem solving skills among primary school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5804-5807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.946
  33. Kaya, V. D., & Kükey, E. (2022). Was emergency remote education enough to save the day? Mathematics teachers' difficulties and ways to cope with these difficulties. The European Educational Researcher, 5(2), 201-224. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.525
  34. Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3502_6
  35. Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Economic Policy Institute.
  36. Lee, V. E., Chow-Hoy, T. K., Burkam, D. T., Geverdt, D., & Smerdon, B. A. (1998). Sector differences in high school course taking: A private school or Catholic school effect? Sociology of Education, 71(4), 314-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673173
  37. Li, X., Bergin, C., & Olsen, A. A. (2022). Positive teacher-student relationships may lead to better teaching. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101581
  38. Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2005). A new look at public and private schools: Student background and mathematics achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 696-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600914
  39. Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651-698. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004651
  40. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/749662
  41. Matabane, M., & Machaba, M. (2024). Cultural transitions in mathematical discourse: Unveiling mathematical writing hurdles during the rite of passage. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 7(2), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2024.11
  42. McCormick, M. P., & O'Connor, E. E. (2015). Teacher–child relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: Does gender matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 502-516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037457
  43. McLure, F. I., Fraser, B. J., & Koul, R. B. (2022). Structural relationships between classroom emotional climate, teacher–student interpersonal relationships and students' attitudes to STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2-3), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09694-7
  44. Nagy, G., Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2010). The development of students' mathematics self-concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00644.x
  45. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
  46. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Turner, D. (2002). Gender differences among elementary school-aged gifted students in achievement, perceptions of ability, and subject preference. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(3), 233-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320202500303
  47. Pekrun, R., Muis, K. R., Frenzel, A. C., & Göetz, T. (2017). Emotions at school. Routledge.
  48. Perez-Felkner, L., Nix, S., & Thomas, K. (2017). Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386
  49. Perie, M., Moran, R., & Lutkus, A. D. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics (NCES 2005–464). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
  50. Peterson, P. E., & Llaudet, E. (2006). On the public-private school achievement debate. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902389
  51. Planty, M., Hussar, W., Snyder, T., Kena, G., KewalRamani, A., & Kemp, J. (2009). The condition of education 2009 (NCES 2009–081). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. DC: Washington
  52. Rada, E., & Lucietto, A. M. (2022). Math anxiety–a literature review on confounding factors. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.12040
  53. Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane & G. Duncan (Eds.). Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 91-116). Russell Sage Foundation.
  54. Reardon, S. F., Cheadle, J. E., & Robinson, J. P. (2009). The effect of Catholic schooling on math and reading development in kindergarten through fifth grade. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 45-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539267
  55. Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268
  56. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders' engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252
  57. Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Piñeiro, I., Valle, A., Sánchez, B., Vieites, T., & Rodríguez-Llorente, C. (2020). Success in mathematics and academic wellbeing in primary-school students. Sustainability, 12(9), 3796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093796
  58. Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
  59. Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5-6 mathematics effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0801_03
  60. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  61. Sakellariou, C. (2017). Private or public school advantage? Evidence from 40 countries using PISA 2012-Mathematics. Applied Economics, 49(29), 2875-2892. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1248361
  62. Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005
  63. Samuelsson, M., & Samuelsson, J. (2016). Gender differences in boys' and girls' perception of teaching and learning math. Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2015.1127770
  64. Sellami, A., Santhosh, M., Bhadra, J., & Ahmad, Z. (2023). High school students' STEM interests and career aspirations in Qatar: An exploratory study. Heliyon, 9(3). e13898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13898
  65. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
  66. Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1759-1785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00404.x
  67. Watt, H. M. G., & Goos, M. (2017). The influence of teachers’ and parents’ values and beliefs on Australian adolescents’ mathematics-related career plans. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 107-123.
  68. Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1594–1611. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027838
  69. Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of educational psychology, 90(2), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202
  70. Zhao, T., & Perez-Felkner, L. (2022). Perceived abilities or academic interests? Longitudinal high school science and mathematics effects on postsecondary stem outcomes by gender and race. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00356-w
  71. Zhou, D., Du, X., Hau, K. T., Luo, H., Feng, P., & Liu, J. (2020). Teacher-student relationship and mathematical problem-solving ability: mediating roles of self-efficacy and mathematical anxiety. Educational Psychology, 40(4), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1696947
  72. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Most read articles by the same author(s)