Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 96 Download : 15

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Online learning became a necessity in many places during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the case of Hong Kong SAR, the pandemic provided a unique opportunity to establish blended learning as a norm. The authors discuss the insights and challenges related to delivering mathematics lessons online in a secondary school during and after the pandemic. A three-year-long case study was conducted to examine the differences in perceptions between a teacher and his five students regarding online mathematics instruction during the suspension of traditional in-class lessons in 2020 and after the resumption of traditional instruction in 2023. The Social-Ecological Approach with domains of structure, agency, and cultural practice was applied in the study, which investigated the perceived benefits of blended learning for both the students and the teachers. Data was collected via interviews. The study explored technological challenges, curriculum adaptations, and the impact of parental support on blended learning. Looking ahead, leveraging motivators like easy access while mitigating distractors through disciplined strategies can optimize blended learning environments. The insights gained from this study provide valuable guidance on the effectiveness of instructional strategies and technological tools, highlighting the features of best practices for future blended learning approaches. Furthermore, the paper provides valuable information for policymakers, educators, and educational technology developers.

Keywords

Blended Learning Mathematics Pandemic Secondary School

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tsui, M. Y., & Mok, I. A. C. (2024). Math lessons go online: Insights and challenges of blended learning during the pandemic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp593-612
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adhikari, J., Scogings, C., Mathrani, A., & Sofat, I. (2017). Evolving digital divides in information literacy and learning outcomes: A BYOD journey in a secondary school. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(4), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2017-0022
  2. Ali, A. (2024). Exploring Trust and Motivation in Mobile Learning Adoption Among Jordanian University Students (2516-2314). https://easychair.org/publications/preprint_download/Sx75
  3. Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C.-N., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134-142. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.19.3.134.pdf
  4. Biasutti, M. (2011). The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1865-1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006
  5. Bidarra, J., & Rusman, E. (2017). Towards a pedagogical model for science education: bridging educational contexts through a blended learning approach. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1265442
  6. Bonk, C. J., Olson, T. M., Wisher, R. A., & Orvis, K. L. (2002). Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 17(3), 97-118. https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/299/195
  7. Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
  8. Bright, A., Welcome, N., & Arthur, Y. (2024). The effect of using technology in teaching and learning mathematics on student’s mathematics performance: The mediation effect of students’ mathematics interest. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2), em059. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14309
  9. Brodersen, R. M., & Melluzzo, D. (2017). Summary of Research on Online and Blended Learning Programs That Offer Differentiated Learning Options. REL 2017-228. Regional Educational Laboratory Central. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572935.pdf
  10. Callaway, S. K. (2012). Implications of online learning: Measuring student satisfaction and learning for online and traditional students. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 35(2), 345-359.
  11. Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748
  13. Crawford, R., & Jenkins, L. (2017). Blended learning and team teaching: Adapting pedagogy in response to the changing digital tertiary environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2924
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  15. Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60, 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
  16. Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: The question of effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49-64. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/d/183899
  17. Fitri, S., & Zahari, C. (2019). The implementation of blended learning to improve understanding of mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012109
  18. Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 7-24. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=2a4deedd62d9aae8dcb229e9f935aba2120b8544
  19. HKU e360. (2023). New insights on key factors impacting students’ wellbeing and schools’ online teaching and calls for collaboration to establish a digital new normal. The University of Hong Kong.
  20. Hong Kong Federation of Education Workers. (2016). e-Learning implementation and effectiveness.
  21. Ilgaz, H., & Gülbahar, Y. (2015). A snapshot of online learners: e-Readiness, e-Satisfaction and expectations. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2117
  22. Insorio, A. O., & Macandog, D. M. (2022). YouTube video playlist as mathematics supplementary learning material for blended learning. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(2), e02212. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/12490
  23. Janssen, K. C., & Phillipson, S. (2015). Are we ready for BYOD? A systematic review of the implementation and communication of BYOD pograms in Australian schools. Australian Educational Computing, 30(2), 1-14. http://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/54/pdf
  24. Kiger, D., & Herro, D. (2015). Bring your own device: Parental Guidance (PG) suggested. Techtrends Tech Trends, 59(5), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0891-5
  25. Lee, J., Song, H.-D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
  26. Li, X., Yang, Y., Chu, S. K. W., Zainuddin, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Applying blended synchronous teaching and learning for flexible learning in higher education: An action research study at a university in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1766417
  27. Mackey, K. (2015). Proof points: Blended learning success in school districts. Christensen Institute. from https://www.christensen-institute.org/publications/proof-points/.
  28. Margolis, A. R., Porter, A. L., & Pitterle, M. E. (2017). Best practices for use of blended learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81349
  29. Minga, C., & Ghosh, S. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of ICT use in promoting teaching learning processes and its outcomes at senior secondary level in Mbeya region, Tanzania: A review. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 37(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2024/v37i11296
  30. Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e‑learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 16(1), 46‑55. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1855/1818
  31. Ott, T., Magnusson, A., Weilenmann, A., & Hård af Segerstad, Y. (2018). “It must not disturb, it’s as simple as that”: Students’ voices on mobile phones in the infrastructure for learning in Swedish upper secondary school. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 517-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9615-0
  32. Pachler, N., Cook, J., Bachmair, B., Kress, G., Seipold, J., Adami, E., & Rummler, K. (2010). Mobile Learning: Structures, Agency, Practices. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0585-7
  33. Parsons, D., & Adhikar, J. (2016). Bring your own device to secondary school: The perceptions of teachers, students and parents. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 14(1), 66-80. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099110.pdf
  34. Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2020). A study of the relationship between students’ engagement and their academic performances in an eLearning environment. E-learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019882567
  35. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
  36. Tynan, B., Ryan, Y., & Lamont‐Mills, A. (2015). Examining workload models in online and blended teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12111
  37. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Social development theory. Instructional Design.
  38. Yang, Q.-F., Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Research focuses and findings of flipping mathematics classes: a review of journal publications based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(6), 905-938. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1637351