Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 6 Download : 1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper was to explore mathematics educators’ perception of the cultural relevance of basic level mathematics in Nepal. The design of this study involved an interpretive qualitative approach by administering in-depth interviews with five purposively selected mathematics educators teaching at five higher education institutions in the Kathmandu valley. Each interview was audio-recorded and transcribed for coding and constructing themes. The major themes that emerged were teaching in a mother language, contextualized Ethnomathematics, and the local knowledge in the curriculum as a teaching approach. The findings of the study can be helpful to curriculum designers and teachers at the basic level of mathematics. The study also adds to the literature of cultural aspects of mathematics teaching and learning and curriculum design

Keywords

cultural relevance curriculum pedagogy basic level mathematics Nepal

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Acharya, B. R. ., Kshetree, M. P. ., Khanal, B. ., Panthi, R. K. ., & Belbase, S. . (2021). Mathematics educators’ perspectives on cultural relevance of basic level mathematics in nepal. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 17–48. Retrieved from https://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/3730
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abacioglu, C. S., Volman, M., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ multicultural attitudes and perspective taking abilities as factors in culturally responsive teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 736-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12328
  2. Abdulrahim, N. A., & Orosco, M. J. (2020). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching: A research synthesis. Urban Review, 52(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00509-2
  3. Aceves, T. C., & Orosco, M. J. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching (Document No. IC-2). Retrieved from https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/culturally-responsive.pdf
  4. Acharya, B. R. (2015). Relevance of primary level mathematics education in Nepal: A cultural perspective. (Doctoral dissertation) Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  5. Acharya, B. R. (2020). Promoting Inclusive Mathematics Classroom Practices in the Schools of Nepal: An Ethnographic Inquiry. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 8, (3), 223-237.
  6. Aguirre, J. M., Berry, R. Q., Gutiérrez, R., Martin, D. B., & Wager, A. (2016). Power concedes nothing without a demand: Challenging the pervasive deficit discourse in mathematics education. Invited Panel Session at the Annual Research Conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Francisco, CA. https://nctm.confex.com/nctm/2016RP/webprogram/Session42814.html
  7. Akar, H. (2003). Impact of constructivist learning process on pre-service teacher education students’ performance, retention, and attitudes. (Doctoral dissertation) Middle East Technical University, Ankara Turkey. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/1102136/index.pdf
  8. Akullo, D., Kanzikwera, R., Birungi, P., Alum, W., Aliguma, L., & Barwogeza, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge in agriculture: A case study of the challenges in sharing knowledge of past generations in a globalized context in Uganda. World Library and Information Congress. http://origin-archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla73/papers/120-Akullo_Kanzikwera_Birungi_Alum_Aliguma_Barwogeza-en.pdf
  9. Alangui, W. V. (2017). Ethnomathematics and culturally relevant mathematics education in the Philippines. In M. Rosa, L. Shirley, M. E. Gavarrete & W. V. Alangui (Eds.), Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for mathematics education (pp. 183–208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_8
  10. Alhanachi, S., de Meijer, L. A. L., & Severiens, S. E. (2021). Improving culturally responsive teaching through professional learning communities: A qualitative study in Dutch pre-vocational schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101698
  11. Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: a synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
  12. Awasthi, L. D. (2004). Exploring monolingual school practices in multilingual Nepal. (Doctoral Dissertation) The Danish University of Education, Copenhagen.
  13. Banks, J. (2016). Cultural diversity and education: Foundation, curriculum and teaching (6thed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  14. Barton, B., Poisard, C., & Domite, M. D. C. (2006). Cultural connections and mathematical manipulations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(2), 21–24. https://halshs.archives-ourvertes.fr/halshs-00856440
  15. Braun, D. C., Gormally, C., & Clark, M. D. (2017). The deaf mentoring survey: a community cultural wealth framework for measuring mentoring effectiveness with underrepresented students. CBE Life Science Education, 16(1):ar10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-07-0155
  16. Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2017). The knowledge and practices of high school science teachers in pursuit of cultural responsiveness. Science Education, 101(1). 99-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21250
  17. Campos, J. A. (2004). Latin American art and geometry. https://uh.edu/honors/Programs-Minors/honors-and-the-schools/houston-teachers-institute/curriculum-units/pdfs/2004/hands-on-geometry/campos-04-geometry.pdf
  18. Carter, P. L., Skiba, R., Arredondo, M. I., & Pollock, M. (2017). You can’t fix what you don’t look at: acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. Urban Education, 52(2), 207–235. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085916660350
  19. Celedón-Pattichis, S., Borden, L. L., Pape, S. J., Clements, D. H., Peters, S. A.,. . . , & Leonard, J. (2018). Asset-based approaches to equitable mathematics education research and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0373.
  20. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). (2001). Population census report. Kathmandu, Nepal: CBS.
  21. Christian, S. (2017). Culturally responsive teaching and student self-efficacy in Alaskan middle schools. (Doctoral dissertation) University of Alaska Fairbanks.
  22. Chronaki, A., & Planas, N. (2018). Language diversity in mathematics education research: a move from language as representation to politics of representation. ZDM, 50, 1101-1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0942-4
  23. Civil, M. (2016). STEM learning research through a funds of knowledge lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9648-2
  24. Civitillo, S., Juang, L. P., Badra, M., & Schachner, M. K. (2019). The interplay between culturally responsive teaching, cultural diversity beliefs, and self-reflection: A multiple case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.002
  25. Clark, L. M., Badertscher, E. M., & Napp, C. (2013). African American mathematics teachers as agents in their African American students’ mathematics identity formation. Teachers College Record, 115(2), 1–36. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=16835
  26. Cohen, L., Manion, L, & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education (6thed.). London: Routledge and Falmer.
  27. Corson, D. (1998). Changing education for diversity. Open University Press.
  28. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  29. Curriculum Development Center (CDC). (2007). National curriculum framework for school education in Nepal. Sanothimi, Bhaktapur: Ministry of Education and Sports, Government of Nepal. Retrieved from https://moe.g.,ov.np/assets/uploads/files/National-Curriculum-Framework-2007-English.pdf
  30. D’Ambrosio, U. (1984). The intercultural transmission of mathematical knowledge: Effects on mathematical education. UNICAMP.
  31. D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. Sense Publishers. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40247876
  32. D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link between traditions and modernity. Brill.
  33. D’Ambrosio, U. (2007). The role of mathematics in building a democratic society. Retrieved from https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/QL/pgs235_238.pdf
  34. David, S. S. (2016). Funds of knowledge for scholars: Reflections on the translation of theory and its implications. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 7(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/26390043.2016.12067803
  35. Davison, M. D., & Mitchell, J. E. (2008). How mathematics education philosophy reflected in math wars? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(1), 143–154. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol5/iss1/15
  36. Divakaran, P. P. (2016). What is Indian about Indian mathematics? Indian Journal of History of Science, 51(1), 56-82. https://doi.org/10.16943/ijhs/2016/v51i1/48378
  37. Dodge, J. (2005). Differentiation in action. New York: Scholastic Inc.
  38. Education Sector Advisory Team (ESAT). (2005). Bidhyalaya star ko patthekram ko adhyen tatha bisleshan: Adibasi janjati dristikonma. Lalitpur: Aadibasi Jana-Jati Uthaan Rastriya Pratisthan.
  39. Ernest, P. (2009). New philosophy of mathematics: Implications for mathematics education. In B. Greer, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. B. Powell, & S. N. Barber (Eds.), Culturally responsive mathematics education, (pp. 44–63). Rutledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879948
  40. Fink, A., Cahill, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., Hoffman, A., & Frey, R. F. (2018). Improving general chemistry performance through a growth mindset intervention: selective effects on underrepresented minorities. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 19(3), 783-806. https://doi.org/10.1039/ c7rp00244k
  41. François, K. (2007). The untouchable and frightening status of mathematics. In K. François & J. P. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions in mathematics education (pp. 13–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71575-9_2
  42. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
  43. Gallivan, H. R. (2017). Supporting prospective middle school teachers’ learning to revise a high-level mathematics task to be culturally relevant. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(2), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.5.2.0094
  44. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
  45. George, J. M. (2005). Indigenous knowledge as a component of the school curriculum. In L. M. Semali & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), What is indigenous knowledge?: Voices from the academy (pp. 79–94). Falmer Press.
  46. Gerdes, P. (1999). Geometry from Africa: Mathematical and educational explorations. The Mathematical Association of America.
  47. Glanfield, F., & Sterenberg, G. (2020). Understanding the landscape of culturally responsive education within a community-driven mathematics education research project. In C. Nicol, J. A. Q. Q. Xiiem, F. Glanfield & A. J. S. Dawson (Eds.), Living culturally responsive mathematics education with/in indigenous communities (pp. 71-90). Leiden: Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415768_004
  48. Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 357–364.
  49. Gutiérrez, R. (2016). Strategies for creative insubordinatation in mathematics teaching. Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 7(1), 52-60. https://www.todos-math.org/assets/documents/TEEM/teem7_final1.pdf
  50. Gutstein, E., Lipman, P., Hernandez, P., & Reyes, R. (1997). Culturally relevant mathematics teaching in Mexican American context. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 709–737. https://doi.org/10.2307/749639
  51. Haris, D., & Putri, R.I.I. (2011). The role of context in the third grader's learning of area measurement. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(1), 55-56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.1.778.55-66
  52. Harrison, C., Tanner, K.D. (2018). Language matters: considering microaggressions in science. CBE Life Science Education, 17(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-01-0011
  53. Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/6.2.245
  54. Jackson, C., & Roberts, S. A. (2017). Dimensions of equity within preservice teachers’ responses to equity quotations. Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 8(1), 6-14.
  55. Jones, V. F., & Louise, J. (1981). Responsible classroom discipline. Allyn.
  56. Jordt, H., Eddy, S. L., Brazil, R., Lau, I., Mann, C., Brownell, S. E., King, K., & Freeman, S. (2017). Values affirmation intervention reduces achievement gap between underrepresented minority and white students in introductory biology classes. CBE Life Science Education, 16(3): ar41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0351
  57. Joseph, G. G. (1997). Foundations of Eurocentrism in mathematics. In A. B. Powell & M. Frankenstein (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 61–82). State University of New York Press.
  58. Joseph, N. M., Spencer, J., Johnson, K. R., & Kitchen, R. (2016, January). Exploring racial consciousness and faculty behavior in STEM classrooms. Presentation at the 20th Annual Conference of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Irvine, CA.
  59. Killpack, T. L., & Melón, L. C. (2016). Toward inclusive stem classrooms: what personal role do faculty play? CBE Life Science Education, 15(3):es3, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0020
  60. Krasnoff, B. (2016). Culturally responsive teaching: A guide to evidence-based practices for teaching all students equitably. Portland, Oregon: Equitable Assistance Center at Education Northwest. https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/resources/culturally-responsive-teaching.pdf
  61. Kurniati, Kusumah, Y.S., Sabandar, J., & Herman, T. (2015). Mathematical critical thinking ability through contextual teaching and learning approach. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 53- 62. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1901.53-62
  62. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). Dream keepers: Successful teachers of African American students. Jossey Bass.
  63. Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dream-keepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  64. Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
  65. Ladson-Billings, G., & Henry, A. (1990). Blurring the borders: Voices of African Liberatory Pedagogy in the United States and Canada. Journal of Education, 172(2), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749017200207.
  66. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics from: How to embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
  67. Larson, M. (2016, April). Access, equity, identity, and agency. President-elect discussion at the Annual Research Conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Francisco, CA.
  68. Lim, L., Tan, M., & Saito, E. (2019). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Developing principles of description and analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.011
  69. Llopart, M., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2018). Funds of knowledge in 21st century societies: Inclusive educational practices for under-represented students. A literature review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(2), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1247913
  70. Luitel, B. C. (2009). Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: A cultural-philosophical inquiry. (Doctoral dissertation) Curtin University of Technology, Perth, W Australia.
  71. Madrazo, A. L., & Dio, R. V. (2020). Contextualized learning modules in bringing students’ learning gaps in calculus with analytic geometry through independent learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12456.457-476
  72. Mathema, K. B., & Bista, M. B. (2006). Study on student performance in SLC: Main report. Ministry of Education and Sports, Education Sector Advisory Team.
  73. McCallops, K., Barnes, T. N., Berte, I., Fenniman, J., Jones, I., Navon, R., & Nelson, M. (2019). Incorporating culturally responsive pedagogy within social emotional learning interventions in urban schools: An international systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 94, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.007
  74. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sources book of new methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  75. Mishler, E. G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(2), 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.5.2.01mod
  76. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C., Caluori, N., & Rabasco, H. (2018). Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles, 79, 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z.
  77. Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
  78. Moyer, P. (2001). Making mathematics culturally relevant. Mathematics Teaching, 176, 3–5. https://www.atm.org.uk/write/MediaUploads/Journals/MT176/Non-Member/ATM-MT176-03-05.pdf
  79. Nabila, L. A., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020). Self-esteem in mathematics learning: How to develop it through contextual teaching and learning approach?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1), 012049. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012049
  80. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  81. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  82. Nergaard, I. (2017). Local knowledge in mathematics teaching: A product of professional action. Doctoral dissertation, the University of Agder.
  83. Nicol, C., Archibald, J., & Baker, J. (2013). Designing a model of culturally responsive mathematics education: Place, relationships and story work. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0062-3
  84. Nicol, S. (2018). Connecting mathematics, community, culture and place: Promise, Possibilities, and Problems. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_24
  85. Powell, R., Cantrell, S. C., Malo-Juvera, V., & Correll, P. (2016). Operationalizing culturally responsive instruction: Preliminary findings of CRIOP research. Teachers College Record, 118(1).
  86. Pradhan, J. B. (2017). Mathematical ideas in Chundara culture: Unfolding a Nepalese teaching and learning system. In M. Rosa, L. Shirley, M. E. Gavarrete & W. V. Alangui (Eds.), Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for mathematics education (pp. 125–152). Springer.
  87. Prahmana, R. C. I., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2020). Learning geometry and values from patterns: Ethnomathematics on the batik patterns of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.2242/jme.11.3.12949.439-456
  88. Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6
  89. Ravn, O., & Skovsmose, O. (2019). Connecting humans to equations: A reinterpretation of the philosophy of mathematics. Springer Nature.
  90. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2016). Humanizing mathematics through ethnomodelling. Gerais Brasil. Journal of Humanistic Mathematic, 6(2), 3 - 22. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1315&context=jhm
  91. Russell, N. M., Haynes, C. M., & Cobb, F. (Eds.). (2016). Interrogating whiteness and relinquishing power: White faculty’s commitment to racial consciousness in STEM classrooms. Peter Lang.
  92. Samo, D. D., Darhim, & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2018). Culture-based contextual learning to increase problem-solving ability of first year university student. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4125.81-94
  93. Scriba, C. J., & Schreiber, P. (2015). 500 years of geometry: Mathematics in history and culture. Springer.
  94. Sharma, S., Bajracharya, R., & Sitaula, B. (2009). Indigenous technology knowledge in Nepal-a review. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 8(4), 569–576.
  95. Sharma, T., & Orey, D. C. (2017). Meaningful mathematics through the use of cultural artifacts. In M. Rosa, L. Shirley, M. E. Gavarrete, & W. V. Alangui (Eds.), Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for mathematics education (pp. 153–179). Springer.
  96. Sharp, J., & Stevens, A. (2007). Culturally–relevant algebra teaching: the case of African drumming. The Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 2(1), 37–57.
  97. Sullivan, T. J. (2001). Methods of social research. Harcourt Collage Publication.
  98. Supiyati, S., Hanum, F., & Jailani. (2019). Ethnomathematics in Sasaknese architecture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5383.47-58
  99. Taylor, E. W., Cranton, P., & Associates. (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass.
  100. The Constitution of Nepal. (2015). Constitution of Nepal 2015, Unofficial English Translation by Nepal Law Society, IDEA, and UNDP. Retrieved from https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/Constitution%20of%20Nepal%202015.pdf
  101. Thomas, J. (2000). Lives on the boundary: The presence of others. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  102. Tsindoli, S., Ongeti, K., Chang’ach, J. K., (2018). Integration of existing indigenous knowledge within mathematics curriculum for primary schools in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), 74-87. https://www.iajournals.org/articles/iajsse_v2_i1_74_87.pdf
  103. UNESCO (2003). Education in a multilingual world. UNESCO.
  104. Upadhyay, H. P. (2001). Effectiveness of constructivism on mathematics achievement of grade V students in Nepal. (PhD Dissertation) Punjab University, Chandigarh, India.
  105. Upadhyay, H. P. (2008). New trends in mathematics education. Vidyarthi Prakashan (P) Ltd.
  106. Utami, N. W., Sayuti, S., & Jailani. (2019). Math and mate in Javanese PRIMBON: Ethnomathematics study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7611.341-356
  107. Vass, G. (2017). Preparing for culturally responsive schooling: Initial teacher educators in the fray. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(5), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702578
  108. Wachira, P., & Mburu, J. (2017). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching and constructivism: Preparing teachers for diverse classrooms. Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2016-0023
  109. Wagley, M. P., Sharma, T. N., Koirala, B. N., Ramos, S. Y., Taylor, P. C., Luitel, B. C., Belbase, S., Pokhrel, T. R., Poudel, A., Neupane, G. K., Poudel, K. P., Adhikary, N. P., Dahal, R. C., & Bhandari, U. (2008). Developing culturally contextualized mathematics resources materials: Capturing local practices of Tamang and Gopali communities. UNESCO.
  110. White, D., Crespo, S., & Civil, M. (Eds.). (2016). Cases for mathematics teacher educators: Facilitating conversations about inequities in mathematics classrooms. AMTE Professional Book Services (Vol. 1). Information Age.
  111. Zaslavsky, C. (1994). “Africa Counts” and ethnomathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 3-8. https://www.nlcsmaths.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26365454/africa.pdf