Main Article Content

Abstract

This descriptive research aimed to know students' problem-solving ability in arithmetic operations on algebra forms through an Indonesian realistic mathematics education, namely Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI), approach in secondary school number 17 Palembang. The learning process, material, and assessment used were principles and characteristics of PMRI. The data collection technique was done by two students' activities and the written test to measure students' problem-solving abilities. The written test, which referred to the indicators of problem-solving ability, was given after the learning process. This study's findings indicate that Palembang's context helps students comprehend algebraic arithmetic operations. The principles and characteristics of PMRI play an essential role in enhancing students' problem-solving skills. To conclude, students develop and solve problems by modeling based on their mathematical ideas. In addition, students must be able to develop problem-solving strategies in which they employ a variety of procedures.

Keywords

Algebra Descriptive Research PMRI Problem Solving The Context of Palembang

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Riskanita, A. D. (2022). Students’ problem-solving ability in solving algebra tasks using the context of Palembang. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp549-564

References

  1. Abdullah, A. S. (2017). Ethnomathematics in perspective of sundanese. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3877
  2. Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Dekker, T., Panhuizen, M. V., de Lange, J., & Wijers, M. (2007). Problem solving as a challenge for mathematics education in the Netherlands. ZDM Mathematic Education, 39, 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0043-2
  3. Entremont, Y. (2015). Linking mathematics, culture and community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2818–2824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.973
  4. Feriana, O., & Putri, R. I. I. (2016). Instructional design cube and volume using the beam filling and packing in class V. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v46i2.9709
  5. Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602
  6. Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ problem-solving strategies in problem solving-mathematics classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4119-4123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.901
  7. Jannah, R. D., & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). Soft tennis and volleyball contexts in Asian Games for PISA- like mathematics problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5248.157-170.
  8. Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
  9. Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0
  10. Kohar, A. W., Wardani, A. K. & Fachrudin, A. D. (2019). Profiling context-based mathematics tasks developed by novice PISA-like task designers. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1200(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012014
  11. Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
  12. Mairing, J. P. (2016). The ability of the students of class VIII in solve math problems based on the level of accreditation. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(2) 179-192
  13. Maryati, & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2019). Ethnomathematics: Exploring the activities of culture festival. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742 6596/1188/1/012024
  14. Melyawati. (2014). The application of cooperative learning model types thinks pair share to enhance student learning outcomes in the form of a countdown operation algebra in SMP Negeri 13 Hammer. Aksioma: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2) 209-219.
  15. Nirmalitasari, O. S. (2012). Profile of students' ability in solving open-start math problems in flat build material. Jurnal MathEdunesa, 1(1) 1-8.
  16. Nizar, H., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi. (2018). Developing PISA-like mathematics problem using the 2018 Asian Games football and table tennis context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5246.183-194
  17. Nova, E., Retta, M. R., & Nopriyanti, T. D. (2022). Student worksheet development using the PMRI approach in the classroom context with an orientation toward students’ conceptual understanding. Journal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 203-21. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.2.14854.203-214
  18. Novita, R., Zulkardi., & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary student's problem-solving ability by doing tasks like PISA's question. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.3.2.571.133-150
  19. Nusantara, D. S. & Putri, R. I. I. (2018). Slope of straight line in ladder: A learning trajectory. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1097(1), 012116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1097/1/012116
  20. Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I. (2021b). Designing Pisa-like mathematics problem using a COVID-19 transmission map context. AIP Conference Proceeding, 2438, 0071596. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0071596
  21. Nusantara, D.S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R.I.I. (2021a). Designing PISA-like mathematics task using a covid-19 context (PISAComat). Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 349-364. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13181.349-364
  22. OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014): Student performance in mathematics, reading, and science. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
  23. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
  24. OECD. (2019). Indonesia – Country Note – PISA 2018 results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf
  25. Oktiningrum, W., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing PISA-like mathematics task with indonesia natural and cultural heritage as context to assess students’ mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2812.1-8
  26. Permatasari, R., & Putri, R. I. I. (2018). PISA-like: Football context in Asian Games. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5251.271-280
  27. Pratiwi, I., & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). Long jump in Asian Games: Context of PISA-like mathematics problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5250.81-92
  28. Putri, R. I. I. (2012). Pendesainan hypotetical learning trajectory (HLT) cerita malin kundang pada pembelajaran matematika. Proceedings of Nasional Seminar of Mathematics and Mathematics Education.
  29. Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2017a). Noticing students' thinking and quality of interactivity during mathematics learning. Proceedings of the First Indonesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leaders International Conference on Education 2017 (Atlantis-press index by Thomson Reuters).
  30. Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2017b). Fraction in shot-put: A learning trajectory. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868, 050005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995132
  31. Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2018). Higher-order thinking skill problem on data representation in primary school: A case study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012056. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012056
  32. Putri, R. I. I., Gunawan, M. S., & Zulkardi, (2017). Addition of fraction in swimming context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012035.
  33. Rahayu, A. P., & Putri, R. I. I. (2018) Learning process of decimal through the base ten strips at the fifth grade. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 153-162.
  34. Rimbayanto, A., & Setyaningsih, N. (2015) Increased ability to reason and solve mathematical problems with an inquiry learning model based on group investigation for students of class VII semester 1 of SMP Grobogan 2 in 2014/2015. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UMS 2015 (Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
  35. Risdiyanti, I., & Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). Ethnomathematics: Exploration in javanese culture. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/943/1/012032
  36. Rosnawati, R. (2013). Mathematical reasoning ability of junior high school students In TIMSS 2011 Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA (MIPA: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta).
  37. Sarbiyono. (2016). The application of mathematical approach realistic mathematical problem-solving ability against students. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(2), 163-173.
  38. Stacey, K. (2005). The place of problem solving in contemporary mathematics curriculum documents. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 341-350.
  39. Sulistiyorini. (2016). Analysis of the trouble students in problem solving math story problem students’ junior high school Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Publikasi Ilmiah. (FKIP: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
  40. Umar, W. (2016). George Polya's version of mathematical problem-solving strategies and their application in mathematics learning [in Bahasa]. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA
  41. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 521–525). Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8
  42. Van Galen, F., & Van Eerde, D. (2018). Mathematical investigations for primary school. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute. Retrieved from http://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/en/impome/
  43. Wahyuni, D., Ariani, N. M., & Syahbana. (2013). Mathematical problem-solving abilities and beliefs of students in learning open-ended and conventional. Journal Pendidikan Matematika Edumatica, 3(1), 35-41.
  44. Wardhani, S. (2004). Contextual problems introducing algebraic forms in middle school. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Rektorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Pusat Pengembangan Penataran Guru Matematika.
  45. Watson, A. (2007). Key understanding of mathematics learning. Paper 6: Algebraic Reasoning (Nuffield Foundation: University of Oxford)
  46. Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity to learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1
  47. Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ error. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584.
  48. Zulkardi & Kohar, A. W. (2018). Designing PISA like mathematics tasks in Indonesia: Experiences and challenges. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 947(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012015
  49. Zulkardi & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). New School Mathematics Curricula, PISA and PMRI in Indonesia. In Lam T.T. et.al (Eds) School Mathematics Curricula: Asian Perspectives and Glimpses of Reform. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6312-2_3
  50. Zulkardi, Meryansumayeka, Putri, R.I.I., Alwi, Z., Nusantara, D.S., Ambarita, S.M., Maharani, Y., & Puspitasari, L. (2020). How students work with pisa-like mathematical tasks using covid-19 context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 405-416. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12915.405-416

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2