Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 207 Download : 27

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

In the 21st century, understanding variability and developing statistical investigation skills are crucial for enhancing students' data literacy. However, these essential skills are often overlooked, limiting students' growth in numeracy whereby statistical problems are frequently disconnected from real-world or cultural contexts, reducing student engagement. To address this issue, this study integrates the culturally relevant context of Lemang Batok, which enhances students' ability to understand, apply, and analyze data through appropriate statistical concepts. The research uses an ethno-flipped classroom model that promotes flexible, collaborative learning, aiming to design a learning trajectory for teaching descriptive statistics in this context to improve numeracy skills. Utilizing design research methodology, specifically a validation study, the research followed three phases: preliminary design, experimental design, and retrospective analysis. The subjects were junior high school students from Medan and Binjai Cities, North Sumatera-Indonesia. The results indicated that the learning trajectory developed through tiered discussions significantly improved students' numeracy skills in descriptive statistics, as evidenced by increased critical thinking and enhanced abilities to analyze variability.

Keywords

Descriptive Statistics Learning Design Research Ethno-Flipped Classroom Model Learning Trajectory Lemang Batok Context

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ramadhani, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Soeharto, & Saleh, A. (2024). Integrating traditional food and technology in statistical learning: A learning trajectory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1277–1310. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1277-1310
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  2. Aras, A., Zahrawati, F., Busrah, Z., & Nzobonimpa, C. (2022). Learning trajectory of quadrilaterals learning using the context of Burongko Bugis cake to improve students’ critical thinking. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.5159
  3. Arnold, J. C., Boone, W. J., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2018). Assessment of competencies in scientific inquiry through the application of rasch measurement techniques. Education Sciences, 8(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040184
  4. Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13394-020-00359-2
  5. Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
  6. Bakker, A. (2019). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701010
  7. Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. A. (2020). Pre-K–12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II). American Statistical Association and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GAISEIIPreK-12_Full.pdf
  8. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2022). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Electronic Journal of Social and Strategic Studies, 3, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.47362/EJSSS.2022.3208
  9. Bond, T., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2020). Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030499
  10. Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
  11. Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics. ZDM, 52(7), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-020-01191-5
  12. Chao, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-T., & Chuang, K.-Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAE.21622
  13. D’Ambrosio, U. (2017). Ethnomathematics and the emergence of mathematics. In The Nature and Development of Mathematics: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives on Cognition, Learning and Culture (pp. 69–85). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648163
  14. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
  15. Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Mathematical literacy. https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/CurriculumAssessmentPolicyStatements(CAPS).aspx
  16. Department of Education and Skills. (2011). Literacy and numeracy learning for life: The national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 2011–2020. https://assets.gov.ie/24521/9e0e6e3887454197a1da1f9736c01557.pdf
  17. Education Council. (2014). The Hobart declaration on schooling. Education Council. https://acara.edu.au/reporting/national-report-on-schooling-in-australia
  18. Fauzan, A., Musdi, E., & Afriadi, J. (2018). Developing learning trajectory for teaching statistics at junior high school using RME approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012040
  19. Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
  20. Fisher, W. P. J. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1), 1095. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm
  21. Freudenthal, H. (2002). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures (Vol. 1). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47235-X
  22. Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012). Auditing the numeracy demands of the Australian curriculum. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573240.pdf
  23. Goos, M., & O’Sullivan, K. (2018). A comparative analysis of numeracy as a driver for curriculum reform in Australia and Ireland. In Y. Shimizu & R. Vithal (Eds.), School mathematics curriculum reforms: Challenges, changes and opportunities. Proceedings of the twenty-fourth ICM1 Study conference (pp. 437–444). International Commission on Mathematical Instruction. https://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/ICMI/ICMI%20studies/ICMI%20Study%2024/ICMI%20Study%2024%20Proceedings.pdf
  24. Goos, M., & O’Sullivan, K. (2023). The evolution and uptake of numeracy and mathematical literacy as drivers for curriculum reform. New ICMI Study Series, Part F776, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13548-4_21/TABLES/1
  25. Gravemeijer, K. (2020). Emergent modeling: An RME design heuristic elaborated in a series of examples. Journal of The International Society for Design and Development in Education, 4(13), 4–31. https://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume4/issue13/article50/
  26. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In Educational Design Research (pp. 29–63). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364-12
  27. Hendroanto, A., van Galen, F., Van Eerde, D., Prahmana, R. C. I., Setyawan, F., & Istiandaru, A. (2018). Photography activities for developing students’ spatial orientation and spatial visualization. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012029
  28. Hidayati, F. N., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Ethnomathematics’ research in Indonesia during 2015-2020. Indonesian Journal of Ethnomathematics, 1(1), 29-42. https://journal.i-mes.org/index.php/ije/article/view/14
  29. Kohar, A. W., Rahaju, E. B., & Rohim, A. (2022). Prospective teachers’ design of numeracy tasks using a physical distancing context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp191-210
  30. Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Suárez, C., Quiroga, S., Sobradiel-Sierra, N., Lozano-Blasco, R., & Rodríguez-Martínez, A. (2021). Flipped Classroom model before and during COVID-19: using technology to develop 21st century skills. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0137
  31. Law of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2017 concerning the Promotion of Culture (Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan). https://pemajuankebudayaan.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/UU-Nomor-5-Tahun-2017-tentang-Pemajuan-Kebudayaan.pdf
  32. Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  33. Marshman, M., & Dunn, P. K. (2024). Improving statistical thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(S1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00477-7
  34. Meyllinda, Patmawati, H., & Setialesmana, D. (2023). The impact of ethno-flipped classroom learning model on students’ mathematical creative thinking ability [Dampak penerapan model pembelajaran ethno-flipped classroom terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis peserta didik]. Jurnal Kongruen, 2(2), 85–92. https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/kongruen/article/view/10946
  35. Miller, T. (2018). Developing numeracy skills using interactive technology in a play-based learning environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40594-018-0135-2/TABLES/4
  36. Ministry of Education. (2023). Education report card in 2023. https://raporpendidikan.kemdikbud.go.id/
  37. Mukwambo, M., Zulu, A., & Kayangula, M. (2023). Exploring numeracy teaching and learning by using ethnomathematics. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 6(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijtlm.v6i2.10592
  38. Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 context questionnaire framework. In TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks (pp. 59–78). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
  39. Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., Li, M., Lobczowski, N. G., Duke, R. F., Wei, L., & Croninger, R. M. V. (2017). Exploring the influence of homogeneous versus heterogeneous grouping on students’ text-based discussions and comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.003
  40. Muslimin, M., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Z., & Aisyah, N. (2020). Learning integers with realistic mathematics education approach based on islamic values. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11721.363-384
  41. Namikawa, Y. (2018). Curriculum reform of Japanese high schools and teacher education based on literacy. In Y. Shimizu & R. Vithal (Eds.), School mathematics curriculum reforms: Challenges, changes and opportunities. Proceedings of the twenty-fourth ICM1 Study conference (pp. 461–466). International Commission on Mathematical Instruction. https://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/ICMI/ICMI%20studies/ICMI%20Study%2024/ICMI%20Study%2024%20Proceedings.pdf
  42. OECD. (2012). Literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264128859-en
  43. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
  44. Parra-López, E., & Oreja-Rodríguez, J. R. (2014). Evaluation of the competiveness of tourist zones of an island destination: An application of a Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM). Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 3, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.12.007
  45. Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 10–51). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf
  46. Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Ethno-realistic mathematics education: The promising learning approach in the city of culture. SN Social Sciences, 2(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43545-022-00571-W
  47. Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). Learning sets theory using shadow puppet: A study of Javanese ethnomathematics. Mathematics, 9(22), 2938. https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH9222938
  48. Prahmana, R. C. I., Hartanto, D., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Ali, R. M., & Muchlas. (2021). Community radio-based blended learning model: A promising learning model in remote area during pandemic era. Heliyon, 7(7), e07511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07511
  49. Prain, V., Xu, L., & Speldewinde, C. (2023). Guiding science and mathematics learning when students construct representations. Research in Science Education, 53(2), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10063-9
  50. Ramadhani, R., Saragih, S., Narpila, S. D., Saragih, D. I., Sari, D. N., & Nuraini, N. (2023). Designing hypothetical learning trajectory of descriptive statistics through ethnomathematics problem assisted TinkerPlots. In A. K. Wardana (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Information Technology and Engineering (ICITE 2023), Advances in Intelligent Systems Research 179 (pp. 19–26). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-338-2_3
  51. Ramadhani, R., Saragih, S., Nuraini, N., Mazaly, M. R., Rusmini, R., & Saragih, D. I. (2022). Flipped classroom model in descriptive statistical learning based on Malay-Deli context. AIP Conference Proceedings 2659, 100008. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113419
  52. Ramadhani, R., Syahputra, E., & Simamora, E. (2021). Ethno-flipped classroom model: Sebuah rekomendasi model pembelajaran matematika di masa new normal [Ethno-flipped classroom model: A recommendation for mathematics learning model in the new normal]. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 10(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v10i2.10331
  53. Ramadhani, R., Syahputra, E., & Simamora, E. (2023a). Merging flipped classroom model with the ethnomathematics approach: A new flexibility learning model. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Summer2023/7
  54. Ramadhani, R., Syahputra, E., & Simamora, E. (2023b). Model ethno-flipped classroom: Solusi pembelajaran fleksibel dan bermakna (Ethno-flipped classroom model: A flexible and meaningful learning solution) (R. Fadhli, Ed.). Indonesia Emas Group. https://indonesiaemasgroup.com/product/model-ethno-flipped-clasroom-solusi-pembelajaran-fleksibel-dan-bermakna/?v=266396349ed3
  55. Ramadhani, R., Syahputra, E., Simamora, E., & Soeharto, S. (2023). Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model. Heliyon, 9(10), 2405–8440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20596
  56. Reinius, H., Korhonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). The design of learning spaces matters: perceived impact of the deskless school on learning and teaching. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09345-8
  57. Rosa, M. (2017). Ethnomodelling as the mathematization of cultural practices. In S. G., B. W., & K. G. (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling and Applications-International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 153–162). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_13
  58. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2022). Conceptualizing positive deviance in ethnomodelling research: Creatively insubordinating and responsibly subverting mathematics education. In Mathematical Modelling Programs in Latin America: A Collaborative Context for Social Construction of Knowledge for Educational Change (pp. 31-51). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04271-3_2
  59. Sharma, S. (2024). Promoting statistical thinking in year 12 multilingual classrooms: a collaborative study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(S1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00472-y
  60. Sholihah, M., & Isnarto, I. (2023). Mathematical representation ability in the implementation of ethno-flipped classroom model assisted by interactive media based on self-efficacy. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v12i1.66362
  61. Shraddha, B. H., Iyer, N. C., Kotabagi, S., Mohanachandran, P., Hangal, R. V., Patil, N., Eligar, S., & Patil, J. (2020). Enhanced learning experience by comparative investigation of pedagogical approach: Flipped classroom. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.003
  62. Siemon, D. (2021). Learning progressions/trajectories in mathematics: Supporting reform at scale. Australian Journal of Education, 65(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211045745
  63. Simon, M. A., Kara, M., Placa, N., & Avitzur, A. (2018). Towards an integrated theory of mathematics conceptual learning and instructional design: The Learning Through Activity theoretical framework. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.04.002
  64. Sjöblom, M., Valero, P., & Olander, C. (2023). Teachers’ noticing to promote students’ mathematical dialogue in group work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(4), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09540-9
  65. Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
  66. Sulistyowati, F., Irmawati, I., Maharani, N. S., & Irfan, M. (2023). Analysis on students’ numeracy skills in solving proportion problems in the contexts of Candi Umbul traditional market. Ethnomathematics Journal, 4(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/ej.v4i2.59924
  67. Swidan, O. (2020). A learning trajectory for the fundamental theorem of calculus using digital tools. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1593531
  68. Tampubolon, T., Sibarani, S., Zuhri, Efendi, Zakiah, N., & Zaini, H. (2023). Ethnomathematics learning to improve students’ understanding for numeracy concepts. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(2), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i2.60716
  69. Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2018). Designing learning environments for critical thinking: Examining effective instructional approaches. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1065–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9829-z
  70. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd Edition). ACSD. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/HowtoDifferentiateInstructioninAcademicallyDiverseClassrooms-3rdEd.pdf
  71. Wang, N., & Stahl, J. (2012). Obtaining content weights for test specifications from job analysis task surveys: An application of the many-facets rasch model. International Journal of Testing, 12(4), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2011.639472
  72. Zalavra, E., Papanikolaou, K., Dimitriadis, Y., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Representing learning designs in a design support tool. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6563–6594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11441-6
  73. Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of group experience and information distribution on collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 47, 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09495-0
  74. Zhang, Z. (2024). Research on student interaction in peer collaborative problem solving in mathematics. In Students’ Collaborative Problem Solving in Mathematics Classrooms. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education (pp. 193–218). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7386-6_8
  75. Zhu, Y., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Impacts of classroom teaching practices on students’ mathematics learning interest, mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics test achievements: a secondary analysis of Shanghai data from the international video study Global Teaching InSights. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 54(3), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-022-01343-9/FIGURES/3

Most read articles by the same author(s)