Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 169 Download : 20

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Students often face difficulties in understanding the concept of limits in functions, a challenge that arises due to the abstract nature and complexity of the topic. Despite being familiar with the procedural steps, students may fail to grasp the underlying meaning of limits. This gap in comprehension leads to significant learning obstacles. As such, there is a critical need for effective didactical designs that can enhance the teaching and learning of this concept. This study aims to address this issue through a Didactical Design Research (DDR) approach, which is structured into three phases. The first phase involves a preliminary didactical design analysis, followed by administering a diagnostic test on the limit of functions to 26 third-semester students (Group 1) who have already completed a differential calculus course. This diagnostic test helps identify the initial learning obstacles. In the second phase, a didactical design is developed to address these obstacles, and it is then implemented with 33 first-semester students (Group 2) enrolled in a Differential Calculus course to evaluate the impact of the design. Data analysis is conducted based on the scores from the written diagnostic test, categorizing them into three levels of ability. The findings reveal that the primary learning obstacle for students is the formal definition of limits, and the identified obstacles are epistemological, psychological ontogenic, instrumental ontogenic, and conceptual ontogenic. The results of implementing the didactical design demonstrate a significant improvement in students' understanding of limits, as evidenced by a reduction in the learning obstacles encountered. This research contributes to the development of more effective didactical approaches for teaching complex mathematical concepts, offering a potential model for addressing similar learning challenges in other abstract topics.

Keywords

Didactical Design Research Differential Calculus Learning Obstacle Limit of Function

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tonra, W. S., Suryadi, D., Mulyaning, E. C., & Kusnandi. (2025). Learning obstacles and the didactical design for teaching the limit of function in a Calculus course. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp153-172
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adiredja, A. P. (2021). The pancake story and the epsilon–delta definition. Primus, 31(6), 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1669231
  2. Bansilal, S., & Mkhwanazi, T. (2021). Pre-service student teachers’ conceptions of the notion of limit. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53, 2083–2101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1864488
  3. Berry, J. S., & Nyman, M. A. (2003). Promoting students’ graphical understanding of the calculus. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 479–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jmathb.2003.09.006
  4. Boester, T. (2008). A design-based case study of undergraduates’ conceptions of limits. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT 3314378).
  5. Bressoud, D., Ghedamsi, I., Martinez-Luaces, V., & Törner, G. (2016). Teaching and learning of calculus. Springer Nature. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/27707/1/1002299.pdf
  6. Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
  7. Buyukköroglu, T., Cetin, N., Deniz, A., Ali, S., Mahir, N., & Ureyin, M. (2006). The effect of computers on teaching the limit concept. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1–12. https://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/buyukkoroglu.pdf
  8. Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, et al. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  9. Colson, A. R., & Cooke, R. M. (2018). Expert elicitation: Using the classical model to validate experts’ judgments. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex022
  10. Denbel, D. G. (2014). Students’ misconceptions of the limit concept in a first calculus course. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(34), 24–40. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/17236/17685
  11. Fuadiah, N. F. (2015). Epistemological obstacles on mathematics’ learning in junior high school students: A study on the operations of integer material. In Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2015) (pp. 315–322). https://eprints.uny.ac.id/23197/1/ME%20-%2043.pdf
  12. Grossfield, A. (2020). Understanding Calculus: Tying loose ends together. In 2020 CIEC. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration. https://peer.asee.org
  13. Gürbüz, M., Ağsu, M., & Özdemir, M. (2018). An analysis of how preservice math teachers construct the concept of limit in their minds. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(6), 103–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1490240
  14. Hardy, N. (2009). Students’ perceptions of institutional practices: The case of limits of functions in college level Calculus courses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9199-8
  15. Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Juandi, D., Dahlan, J. A., Hidayat, R., Wardat, Y., Sahara, S., & Muhaimin, L. H. (2024). The didactic phenomenon: Deciphering students’ learning obstacles in set theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 517–544. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp517-544
  16. Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2019). Challenges of maintaining cognitive demand during the limit lessons: understanding one mathematician’s class practices. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 856–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1543811
  17. Jordaan, T. (2005). Misconceptions of the limit concept in a mathematics course for engineering students (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43165567.pdf
  18. Juter, K. (2007). Students' conceptions of Limits: High achievers versus low achievers. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 4(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1058
  19. Lutfi, M. K., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2021). Students' ontogenic obstacle on the topic of triangle, and quadrilateral. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012108
  20. Martono, K. (1999). Kalkulus [Calculus]. Erlangga.
  21. Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.7275/a5vq-7q66
  22. Nagle, C. (2013). Transitioning from introductory calculus to formal limit conceptions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(2), 2–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43894843
  23. Nagle, C., Tracy, T., Adams, G., & Scutella, D. (2017). The notion of motion: Covariational reasoning and the limit concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1262469
  24. Nurhayati, L., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Herman, T. (2023). Integral (antiderivative) learning with APOS perspective: A case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 129–148. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp129-148
  25. Oehrtman, M. (2008). Layers of abstraction: Theory and design for the instruction of limit concepts. Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 73, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9780883859759.007
  26. Prabowo, A., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., Juandi, D., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Learning obstacles in the making of lesson plans by prospective mathematics teacher students. Education Research International, 2022(1), 2896860. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2896860
  27. Perbowo, K.S., & Anjarwati, R. (2017). Analysis of students’ learning obstacles on learning invers function material. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p169-176
  28. Purnomo, D., Nusantara, T., & Rahardjo, S. (2017). The characteristic of the process of students' metacognition in solving Calculus problems. International Education Studies, 10(5), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p13
  29. Puspita, E., Suryadi, D., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2023). Learning obstacles of prospective mathematics teachers: A case study on the topic of implicit derivatives. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 14(1), 174–189. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/kreano/article/view/42805/14367
  30. Rasmussen, C., Marrongelle, K., & Borba, M. C. (2014). Research on calculus: What do we know and where do we need to go?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0615-x
  31. Sari, R. N., Rosjanuardi, R., Isharyadi, R., & Nurhayati, A. (2024). Level of students' proportional reasoning in solving mathematical problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1095-1114. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1095-1114
  32. Stewart, J. (1999). Kalkulus [Calculus]. Erlangga.
  33. Sukarma, I. K., Isnawan, M. G., & Alsulami, N. M. (2023). Understanding learning barriers in fractional multiplication: An investigation using hermeneutics phenomenology. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 03(08), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/v03i8y2023-07
  34. Supriadi, N., Diana, N., Muhassin, M., & Lestari, B. D. (2020). Guided discovery approach in the development of calculus modules on derivative material with Islamic nuance and environmental insight. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012057. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012057
  35. Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR) [Philosophical foundation of didactical design research (DDR)]. Gapura Press.
  36. Swinyard, C. (2011). Reinventing the formal definition of limit: The case of Amy and Mike. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.01.001
  37. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
  38. Varberg, D., Purcell, E., & Rigdon, S. (2013). Calculus: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. https://archive.org/details/matematika-a-purcell-calculus-9th-ed

Most read articles by the same author(s)