Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1108 Download : 387

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Solving arithmetic word problems has been a challenge for primary students due to difficulties in understanding the problem structure and relating the quantities in the problem to each other. This paper reports on an action research study to enhance students’ subtraction word problem-solving skills. The authors observed that their students had difficulties in representing the situations in word problems and solving the problems correctly. They designed, implemented, and analyzed an intervention to scaffold their students’ subtraction word problem-solving skills. As part of the intervention, a digital subtraction game was developed and used with second and third-grade students. The game involves three different representations: a discrete visual model, a bar model, and a number sentence. The students played the game and solved additional problems to strengthen their skills for representing and solving subtraction word problems. Twenty-four 2nd grade students in China and two 3rd grade students in Turkey participated in the study. Data sources included a pre-test, a post-test, student worksheets, and teachers’ filed notes. Data analysis showed an increase in students’ subtraction word problem-solving performance. They also effectively used a variety of representations to represent problem situations. The design and implementation processes of the intervention are discussed in the paper. We share suggestions for future implementation.

Keywords

Game-Based Learning Problem-Solving Subtraction Word Problems Technology-Enhanced Instruction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Erbilgin, E., & Macur, G. M. A. . (2022). A subtraction game to scaffold primary students’ word problem solving skills. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp307-322
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ang, W. H. (2008). Singapore’s textbook experience 1965–97: Meeting the needs of curriculum change. In S.K. Lee, C.B. Goh, B. Fredriksen, & J.P. Tan (Eds.), Toward a better future: Education and training for economic development in Singapore since 1965 (pp. 69–95). World Bank.
  2. Capone, R., Filiberti, F., & Lemmo, A. (2021). Analyzing difficulties in arithmetic word problem solving: An epistemological case study in primary school. Education Sciences, 11(10), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100596
  3. Carey, D. A. (1991). Number sentences: Linking addition and subtraction word problems and symbols. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.22.4.0266
  4. Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9–24). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Carpenter, T. P., Moser, J. M., & Bebout, H. C. (1988). Representation of addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(4), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.5.0385
  6. Cummins, D. D. (1991). Children's interpretations of arithmetic word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8(3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0803_2
  7. Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
  8. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1985, October). Writing number sentences to represent addition and subtraction word problems. In S. K. Damarin & M. Shelton (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh annual meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 50-56). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED411127.pdf#page=62
  9. Divjak, B., & Tomić, D. (2011). The impact of game-based learning on the achievement of learning goals and motivation for learning mathematics-literature review. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 35(1), 15-30. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/103887
  10. Fisher, C. (2014). Designing games for children: Developmental, usability, and design considerations for making games for kids. Routledge.
  11. Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Sterba, S. K., Craddock, C., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Geary, D. C., & Changas, P. (2021). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467
  12. Gooding, S. (2009). Children's difficulties with mathematical word problems. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 29(3), 31-36. https://bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BSRLM-IP-29-3-06.pdf
  13. Hébert, C., & Jenson, J. (2019). Digital game-based pedagogies: Developing teaching strategies for game-based learning. Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 15. https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/digital-game-based-pedagogies-developing-teaching-strategies-for-game-based-learning/
  14. Kaur, B. (2019). The why, what and how of the ‘Model’ method: A tool for representing and visualising relationships when solving whole number arithmetic word problems. ZDM, 51, 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1000-y
  15. Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Hendri, S. (2019). Mathematical connection of elementary school students to solve mathematical problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5416.69-80
  16. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
  17. Mason, J. (2018). Structuring structural awareness: A commentary on chapter 13. In M. G. Bartolini Bussi & X. H. Sun (Eds.), Building the foundation: Whole numbers in the primary grades (pp. 325–340). New ICMI Study Series. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63555-2_14
  18. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). You and your action research project (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  19. Murdiyani, N. M., Putri, R. I. I., van Eerde, D., & van Galen, F. (2013). Developing a model to support students in solving subtraction. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.567.95-112
  20. Ng, S. F., & Lee, K. (2005). How primary five pupils use the model method to solve word problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 60–83. https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/73/1/TME-9-1-60.pdf
  21. Olson, J. C. (2007). Developing students' mathematical reasoning through games. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(9), 464-471. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.13.9.0464
  22. Osman, S., Yang, C. N. A. C., Abu, M. S., Ismail, N., Jambari, H., & Kumar, J. A. (2018). Enhancing students’ mathematical problem-solving skills through bar model visualisation technique. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3919
  23. Parks, A. N. (2015). Exploring mathematics through play in the early childhood classroom. Teachers College Press.
  24. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
  25. Powell, S. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
  26. Schmittau, J., & Morris, A. (2004). The development of algebra in the elementary mathematics curriculum of V. V. Davydov. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 60–87. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.3117&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  27. Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402
  28. Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., & Wind, A. P. (2014). Game-based learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 485–503). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_38
  29. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2019). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (10th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/samplechapter/0/2/0/5/020538689X.pdf
  30. Vaughn, M., Parsons, S. A., Kologi, S., & Saul, M. (2014). Action research as a reflective tool: A multiple case study of eight rural educators’ understandings of instructional practice. Reflective Practice, 15(5), 634-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.900030
  31. Willis, G. B., & Fuson, K. C. (1988). Teaching children to use schematic drawings to solve addition and subtraction word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.192
  32. Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.