Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 554 Download : 323

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.

Keywords

Learning Obstacle Probability Probabilistic Thinking Theory of Didactical Situation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sari, A. D., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2024). Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Armiati, Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., & Sya’bani, F. (2022). Local instructional theory of probability topics based on realistic mathematics education for eight-grade students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(4), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i4.pp703-722
  2. Artigue, M., Haspekian, M., & Corblin-Lenfant, A. (2014). Introduction to the Theory of Didactical Situations (TDS). In Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education (pp. 47–65). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_4
  3. Baltaci, S. (2016). Examination Of Gifted Students’ Probability Problem Solving Process In Terms Of Mathematical Thinking. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 18–35.
  4. Batanero, C., Arteaga, P., Serrano, L., & Ruiz, B. (2014). Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Perception of Randomness (pp. 345–366). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_19
  5. Brosseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situation in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  6. Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children ’ s understanding of probability A literature review (full report ). Nuffield Foundation, 1–85.
  7. Dooren, W. Van. (2014). Probabilistic Thinking: Analyses from a Psychological Perspective. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic Thinking (pp. 123–126). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0
  8. Fa’ani, A. M., Purwanto, & Sudirman. (2016). Level Berpikir Probabilistik Siswa MA KH.MOH. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pembelajaranannya, Jurusan Matematika, FMIPA UM, 1–7.
  9. Fauzi, I., & Suryadi, D. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Learning Obstacles on the Fraction Addition Material for Five Graders of Elementary Schools. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i1.6020
  10. Galavotti, M. C. (2015). Probability Theories and Organization Science. Journal of Management, 41(2), 744–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314532951
  11. Gürbüz, R., Birgin, O., & Çatlioǧlu, H. (2012). Comparing the probability-related misconceptions of pupils at different education levels. Online Submission, 14(2), 307–357.
  12. HodnikČadež, T., & Škrbec, M. (2011). Understanding the Concepts in Probability of Pre-School and Early School Children. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75203
  13. Hokor, E. K. (2023). Probabilistic Thinking for Life : The Decision-Making Ability of Professionals in Uncertain Situations To cite this article : professionals in uncertain situations . International Journal of Studies in Education and Probabilistic Thinking for Life : The D. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science (IJSES), 4(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.44
  14. Inzunza Cazares, S., & Rocha Ruiz, E. (2021). Los datos y el azar en el currículo de educación básica y bachillerato: reflexiones desde la perspectiva internacional. Diálogos Sobre Educación, 23. https://doi.org/10.32870/dse.v0i23.717
  15. Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, A. T. (1997). A Framework for Assessing and Nurturing Young Children’s Thinking in Probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 101–125.
  16. Kennedy, L. M., & Johnson, A. (2007). Guiding Children ’ s Learning of Mathematics, Eleventh Edition.
  17. Koparan, T., & Rodríguez-Alveal, F. (2022). Probabilistic thinking in prospective teachers from the use of TinkerPlots for simulation: Hat problem. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202217461
  18. Kurniasih, R., & Sujadi, I. (2017). Probabilistic Learning in Junior High School: Investigation of Student Probabilistic Thinking Levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012028
  19. Lamprianou, I., & Lamprianou, T. A. (2003). The Probabilistic Thinking Of Primary School Pupils In Cyprus: The Case Of Tree Diagrams. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), International Group For The Psychology Of Mathematics Education (Pp. 173–180). International Group For The Psychology Of Mathematics Education.
  20. Maharani, R. D., Dasari, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2022). Analisis Hambatan Belajar (Learning Obstacle) Siswa Smp Pada Materi Peluang. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 3201. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.6214
  21. Maher, Carolyn. A., & Ahluwalid, A. (2014). Counting as a Foundation for Learning to Reason About Probability. In Probabilistic Thinking : Presenting Plural Perspectives (pp. 559–581).
  22. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE.
  23. Nikiforidou, Z. (2018). Probabilistic Thinking and Young Children: Theory and Pedagogy. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1044-7_2
  24. Nur, M. S. (2021). Desain Didaktis Materi Peluang Berdasarkan Learning Obstacle Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa MTS. UJMES, 06, 1.
  25. Nurhayati, L., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Herman, T. (2023). Integral (antiderivative) learning with APOS perspective: A case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp129-148
  26. Prihartini, N., Puspita Sari, & Ibnu Hadi. (2020). Design Research: Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Konsep Peluang Dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia Pada Siswa Kelas IX di SMPN 220 Jakarta. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.041.01
  27. Raya, R. (2017). Profil Berpikir Probabilistik Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Probabilitas. Sains, 17(1), 14–18.
  28. Raya, R., St Suwarsono, & Lukito, A. (2021). Probabilistic Thinking of Senior High School Students with Low Mathematical Abilities in Solving Probability Tasks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1752(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012073
  29. Sari, A. D., Dasari, D., Priatna, N., & Herman, T. (2023). Kemampuan Probabilistic Thinking Peserta Didik Smp Dalam Materi Peluang. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 1800. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.6545
  30. Sari, D. I., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). Probabilistic Thinking of Elementary School Students in Solving Contextual and Non Contextual Probability Tasks. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1867(May), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994431
  31. Sari, D. I., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2018a). Analisis Penyelesaian Tugas Probabilitas Sisanalisis Penyelesaian Tugas Probabilitas Siswa Sd Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Kemampuan Matematika Dan Gender. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v7i1.1344
  32. Sari, D. I., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2018b). Perkembangan Berpikir Probabilistik Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 1(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v1n1.p30-39
  33. Serradó, A., Secundaria, P. E., & Azcárate, P. (2005). Obstacles In The Learning Of Probabilisticknowledge: Influence From The Textbooks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(2), 59–81. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj
  34. Sezgin Memnun, D., Ozbilen, O., & Dinc, E. (2019). A Qualitative Research on the Difficulties and Failures about Probability Concepts of High School Students. Journal of Educational Issues, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v5i1.14146
  35. Sharma, S. (2016). Probability From A Socio-Cultural Perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v15i2.244
  36. Shodiqin, A., Nuraini, A., & Wulandari, D. (2022). Profil Berpikir Probabilistik dalam Pemecahan Materi Peluang Kejadian Berdasarkan Self-efficacy. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i2.5550
  37. Shodiqin, A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, & Isnarto. (2021). Probabilistic Thinking Profile of Mathematics Teacher Candidates in Problem Solving based on Self-Regulated Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1199
  38. Suryadi, D. (2010). Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Pembentukan Karakter Bangsa.
  39. Suryadi, D. (2019a). Landasan Filosofis Penelitian Desain Didaktis (Tim Gapura Press, Ed.; 1st ed.). Gapura Press.
  40. Suryadi, D. (2019b). Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR) dan Implementasinya (L. H. Fasha, Ed.; 1st ed.). Gapura Press.
  41. Sya’bani, F., Armiati, Permana, D., Arnawa, I. M., & Asmar, A. (2021). The practicality of learning design based on realistic mathematics education for probability topic of grade VIII junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1742/1/012036
  42. Wijaya, A., Elmaini, & Doorman, M. (2021). A learning trajectory for probability: A case of game-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.1.12836.1-16
  43. Yusuf, M., Rahim, S. S. A., & Eu, L. K. (2021). Obstacles Faced by College Students in Solving Probability Word Problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.1.12801.83-90

Most read articles by the same author(s)