Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 703 Download : 402

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to generate a learning trajectory in an introduction to early mathematics, precisely to measure learning using educational games and Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and to describe young children’s curiosity in learning early mathematics. Children need to have an understanding to take a measurement and use a learning trajectory to learn how to differentiate measurable and countable quantities and to tell the longer and the greater in number. The design of this research involves three phases, namely, preliminary design, experimentation, and retrospective analysis. A Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) using educational games was developed by collecting data from documentation, observations, and interviews. The results obtained from the implementation in the classroom showed that the educational games were able to help young children get to know early mathematics, particularly on measurements of lengths and volumes. There is an association with several factors in the selection of realistic problems. Communications during the game could stimulate an introduction to measurement. The use of objects in students’ vicinity also contributed to their experiments relating to measurement. The results of this research inform policymaking for teachers in designing learning in the classroom in introducing early mathematics based on educational games and Realistic Mathematics Education (RME).

Keywords

Design Research Early Childhood Early Mathematics Educational Game Learning Trajectory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahayu, C., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2022). Curiosity: A game-based early mathematics case. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp275-288
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akkas, M., & Suryawati, E. A. (2021). Buku Panduan Guru Capaian Pembelajaran Elemen Dasar-Dasar [Teacher's Guidebook Learning Outcomes Basic Elements]. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.
  2. Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An Introduction to Design-Based Research with an Example From Statistics Education BT - Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. In Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (Issue Chapter 16). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6
  3. Baroody, A. J., Lai, M. L., & Mix, K. S. (2006). The development of young children’s number and operation sense and its implications for early childhood education. In Handbook of research on the education of young children (In B. Spod, pp. 187–221). Erlbaum.
  4. Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade?. AERA Open, 1(4), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415616358
  5. Beloglovsky, M., & Daly, L. (2015). Early learning theoris made visible (first). Minnesota: Redleaf Press.
  6. Bozick, R., Owings, J. A., Frye, D., Baroody, A. J., Burchinal, M., Carver, S. M., Jordan, N. C., McDowell, J., Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., Siegler, R. S., Powell, S. R., Herbert, M. A., Cohen, J. A., Casa, T. M., & Firmender, J. M. (2017). Mathematics coursetaking and achievement at the end of high school: Evidence from the education longitudinal study of 2002. Journal of Writing Research, 2002, 165.
  7. Bustang, Zulkardi, Darmawijoyo, Dolk, M., & van Eerde, D. (2013). Developing a local instruction theory for learning the concept of angle through visual field activities and spatial representations. International Education Studies, 6(8), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n8p58
  8. Clements, D. H., Baroody, A. J., & Sarama, J. (2013). Background Research on Early Mathematics. 1–66.
  9. Clements, D. H., Wilson, D. C., & Sarama, J. (2004). Young children’s composition of geometric figures: A learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_5
  10. Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. National Academies Press.
  11. De Lange, J. (2019). Curious minds: Serious play. Theory and Practice: An Interface or A Great Divide?, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.37626/ga9783959871129.0.26
  12. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
  13. Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Learning trajectories and local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105–128.
  14. Joubish, M. F., & Khurram, M. A. (2011). Cognitive development in jean piaget’s work and its implications for teachers. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(8), 1260-1265.
  15. Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, (2 Ed.), May 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0034
  16. Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. D., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., & Kaji, J. (2018). Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale (5DC), 73, 21-22.
  17. Klahr, D., Zimmerman, C., & Jirout, J. (2011). Educational interventions to advance children’s scientific thinking. Science, 333(6045), 971-975. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204528
  18. Litman, J. A. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 793-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000101
  19. Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014
  20. Marion, Zulkardi, & Somakim. (2015). Desain pembelajaran pola bilangan menggunakan model jaring laba-laba di smp [Number pattern learning design using spider web model in junior high school]. Jurnal Kependidikan, 45(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v45i1.7185
  21. Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2015). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 6737–6739. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3063
  22. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2021.01.002
  23. Peirce, N. (2013). Digital game-based learning for early childhood. A State of the Art Report on March 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25305.42087
  24. Piaget, J. (1983). Handbook of Child Psychology (4th edition). Wiley.
  25. Pramudiani, P., Zulkardi, Hartono, Y., & Van Amerom, B. (2011). A concrete situation for learning decimals. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.750.215-230
  26. Putri, R. I. I., Dolk, M., & Zulkardi. (2015). Professional development of pmri teachers for introducing social norms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1900.11-19
  27. Raharja, S., Wibhawa, M. R., & Lukas, S. (2018). Mengukur rasa ingin tahu siswa [Measuring student curiosity]. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 14(2), 151-164.
  28. Schneider, M. C., & Gowan, P. (2013). Investigating teachers’ skills in interpreting evidence of student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2013.793185
  29. Shah, P. E., Weeks, H. M., Richards, B., & Kaciroti, N. (2018). Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement. Pediatric Research, 84(3), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0039-3
  30. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
  31. Tedjawati, J., & Sari, L. S. (2017). Model Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Satu Tahun Sebelum Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Nonformal dan Informal dan Pendidikan Masyarakat [Early Childhood Education Model One Year Before Elementary School: A Study of Early Childhood Education, Non-formal and Informal and Community Education]. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud.
  32. Trundle, K. C., Mollohan, K., & Smith, M. M. (2013). Plants, alike and different. Science and Children, 50(6), 52–57.
  33. Walle, J. A. V. D. (2008). Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah [Elementary and Middle School Mathematics]. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.
  34. Wijaya, A., Elmaini, & Doorman, M. (2021). A learning trajectory for probability: A case of game-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.1.12836.1-16
  35. Zulkardi. (2002). Developing A Learning Environment on Realistic Mathematics Education for Indonesian Student Teacher (Doctoral disertation, University of Twente, Enschede). 1–218.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>