Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 297 Download : 101

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Metacognitive skills are increasingly acknowledged as a decisive determinant of mathematical proficiency, as they enable students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their cognitive strategies in problem-solving. However, empirical studies rarely focus on how these skills are exhibited by students with low self-efficacy, a population particularly vulnerable to persistent underachievement in mathematics. Addressing this gap, the present study provides novel insights into the metacognitive functioning of low self-efficacy students when engaging with problem-solving tasks, specifically in the context of the Pythagorean Theorem. The study aimed to describe the manifestation of metacognitive skills among junior high school students with low self-efficacy and analyze their problem-solving strategies and underlying thought processes. Employing a descriptive qualitative design, participants were identified as low self-efficacy students using a standardized questionnaire. Data were obtained from self-efficacy questionnaires, problem-solving tasks, and semi-structured interviews, and subsequently analyzed through metacognitive indicators embedded within Polya’s problem-solving framework. Findings indicate that while low self-efficacy students exhibited consistent awareness and evaluative monitoring, their regulatory skills were less developed, particularly in the reviewing stage of problem-solving. Although planning and assessment strategies were evident, frequent errors required iterative adjustments before arriving at correct solutions. These results highlight the intertwined relationship between metacognition and affective-motivational factors, suggesting that mathematics instruction should explicitly integrate self-efficacy enhancement with metacognitive training. The study contributes to advancing the theoretical discourse on mathematics learning and offers practical implications for designing instructional models that accommodate learners with diverse motivational profiles.

Keywords

Metacognitive Skills Problem Solving Pythagorean Theorem Self-Efficacy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pathuddin, Azizah, N., Lefrida, R., & Alfisyahra. (2025). Metacognitive skills in low self-efficacy students: A case study of junior high school students in the using of the Pythagorean theorem. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(3), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp783-798
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdelshiheed, M., Zhou, G., Maniktala, M., Barnes, T., & Chi, M. (2023). Metacognition and motivation: The role of time-awareness in preparation for future learning. Department of Computer Science. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.13541
  2. Adhitama, I., Sujadi, I., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Discover the Pythagorean theorem using interactive multimedia learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012066
  3. Agbata, B. C., Obeng-Denteh, W., Kwabi, P. A., Abraham, S., Okpako, S. O., Arivi, S. S., Asante-Mensa, F., & Adu, G. W. K. (2024). Everyday uses of mathematics and the roles of a mathematics teacher. Science World Journal, 19(3), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v19i3.29
  4. Anggraini, E., Subanji, S., & Rahardjo, S. (2024). The role of self-efficacy in enhance metacognitive and academic performance through problem-solving. PRISMA, 13(2), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i2.4382
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  6. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
  7. Bozgün, K., & Pekdoğan, S. (2018). The self-efficacy as predictors of the metacognition skills in children. Journal of Education and Future, 14(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.390814
  8. Callan, G. L., Marchant, G. J., Finch, W. H., & German, R. L. (2016). Metacognition, strategies, achievement, and demographics: Relationships across countries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(5), 1485–1502. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.5.0137
  9. Clivaz, S., & Miyakawa, T. (2020). Cultural effects on mathematics lessons: through the international collaborative development of a lesson in two countries. HAL Open Science. https://hal.science/hal-02459223v1
  10. Duratun, A. D., & Maryani, I. (2023). The influence of self-efficacy on metacognition skills of high grade students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i3.62125
  11. Gjone, G. (1998). Programs for the education of researchers in mathematics education. Kluwer Academic. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-5194-8_8
  12. Gözde, A. (2020). Non-routine problem solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.3907
  13. Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive skills and problem-solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594
  14. Henra, K., Budayasa, I. K., & Ismail. (2024). Revealing the dominant metacognitive activities of high school students in solving central tendency and dispersion problems based on gender. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1357–1382. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1357-1382
  15. Hermin, A. P., Pathuddin, Lefrida, R., & Alfisyahra. (2025). Exploring students’ metacognition in numeracy problem solving: The role of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(1), 688–707. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v26i1.pp688-707
  16. Jameson, M. M., Dierenfeld, C., & Ybarra, J. (2022). The mediating effects of specific types of self-efficacy on the relationship between math anxiety and performance. Education Sciences, 12(11), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110789
  17. Joshi, R., Hadley, D., Nuthikattu, S., Fok, S., Goldbloom-Helzner, L., & Curtis, M. (2022). Concept mapping as a metacognition tool in a problem-solving-based BME course during in-person and online instruction. Biomedical Engineering Education, 2(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00066-3
  18. Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
  19. Meher, V., Baral, R., & Bhuyan, S. (2024). Examining impact of metacognitive interventions on self-efficacy of higher secondary school students: A quasi-experimental study. American Journal of Education and Learning, 9(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.55284/ajel.v9i2.1171
  20. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
  21. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2019). Highlights TIMSS 2019: International results in maths and science. IEA. https://www.skolporten.se/app/uploads/2020/12/timss-2019-highlights-1.pdf
  22. Ningsih, N. I. S., Maharani, S., Shofari, M. R., Verlanda, M. A., & Riyanto, O. R. (2023). The influence of self-efficacy on self-anxiety based on students’ mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, 2(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i3.193
  23. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. In OECD Publishing: Vol. III. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii-acd78851-en.htm
  24. Pathuddin, & Bennu, S. (2021). Metacognitive skills of students with high mathematical abilities in solving contextual problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012048
  25. Pathuddin, Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2018). Metacognitive knowledge of a student in planning the solution of limit problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012032
  26. Pathuddin, Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2019). Metacognitive activity of male students: Difference field independent-dependent cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1218(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1218/1/012025
  27. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press. https://www.hlevkin.com/hlevkin/90MathPhysBioBooks/Math/Polya/George_Polya_How_To_Solve_It_.pdf
  28. Prakoso, A. F., Subroto, W. T., Andriansyah, E. H., Sari, V. B. M., Ginanjar, A. E., & Srisuk, P. (2025). How do anxiety and self-efficacy affect the problem-solving skills of undergraduate economics students as prospective teachers in Indonesia? The role of metacognition as a mediating variable. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2521160. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2521160
  29. Ridlo, S., & Lutfiya, F. (2017). The correlation between metacognition level with self-efficacy of biology education college students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824(1), 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012067
  30. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Eds.). NFER-¬‐Nelson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284672098
  31. Shimizu, Y. (2022). Relation between mathematical proof problem solving, math anxiety, self-efficacy, learning engagement, and backward reasoning. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(6), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n6p62
  32. Sikdar, P. R. (2024). Development & use of progressive techniques in mathematics education. Tech Horizons: Bridging Disciplines in the Era of Emerging Technologies. https://iipseries.org/assets/docupload/rsl20249306D1326077BB5.pdf
  33. Situngkir, F. L., & Dewi, I. (2022). The view of mathematics education as science. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(3), 328–332. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.155
  34. Subba, B. H., Chanunan, S., & Poonpaiboonpipat, W. (2025). A proposed constructivism-based instructional model to enhance metacognition and mathematical problem-solving skills in Bhutanese grade nine students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp51-72
  35. Švecová, V. (2024). Math anxiety and its relation to the success of mathematical problems. TEM Journal, 13(1), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131-21
  36. Taamneh, M. A., Díez-Palomar, J., & Mallart-Solaz, A. (2024). Examining tenth-grade students’ errors in applying Polya’s problem-solving approach to Pythagorean theorem. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2551. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15707
  37. Tchounwou, M., Okoye, Ebele. C., & Iseguede, F. (2023). Comparison of the efficacy of metacognition on students’ academic performance between USA, France, Australia, and China. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(7), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.14833
  38. Wutsqa, D. U., Prihastuti, P. P., Fauzan, M., & Listyani, E. (2024). Radial Basis Function Neural Network with ensemble clustering for modeling mathematics achievement in Indonesia based on cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 751–770. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp751-770
  39. Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy: A systematic review of intervention studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 986622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986622