Article Sidebar

Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Despite increasing global efforts to promote gender equity in education, gender stereotypes continue to pose significant barriers to female students’ engagement and achievement in mathematics, particularly within pathways leading to STEM careers. Prior studies have established the detrimental effects of such stereotypes, yet there remains a limited understanding of the mediating role these beliefs play in the relationship between mathematical self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety, especially among pre-university students in developing countries. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the mediating influence of gender stereotypes on the link between self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety among Peruvian pre-university students pursuing STEM-related fields. A total of 304 participants (116 males and 188 females), aged 16 to 35, were drawn from science (n = 38), technology (n = 26), engineering (n = 142), and mathematics (n = 98) disciplines. Quantitative analyses revealed that female students reported significantly higher levels of perceived gender stereotype threat, lower mathematical self-efficacy, and elevated mathematics anxiety compared to their male counterparts. Mediation analysis further demonstrated that stereotype-induced identity threat undermines self-efficacy, thereby intensifying anxiety related to mathematics. However, the study acknowledges limitations, including gender and field imbalances within the sample and the limited scope of variables examined. These findings underscore the urgent need for educational interventions that address stereotype threats and foster equitable learning environments. The results contribute to the broader discourse on gender equity in mathematics education and inform strategies to support female students' sustained participation in STEM trajectories.

Keywords

Gender Differences Math Achievement Math Anxiety Mathematics Self-Efficacy STEM Education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Real, I. I., & Carvalho, C. (2025). The influence of gender stereotypes on self-efficacy and mathematical anxiety in Peruvian students aspiring to STEM careers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2). Retrieved from http://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/3446
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Albeshree, F., Al-Manasia, M., Lemckert, C., Liu, S., & Tran, D. (2020). Mathematics teaching pedagogies to tertiary engineering and information technology students: a literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1609–1628. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1837399
  2. Ali, P., & Younas, A. (2021). Understanding and interpreting regression analysis. Evidence-Based Nursing, 24(4), 116-118. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2021-103425
  3. Álvarez, M. (2017). Autoeficacia según el género y su influencia en el ámbito científico-tecnológico. [Master Thesis - Universidad de Salamanca, España]. Repositorio institucional US. http://hdl.handle.net/10366/132350
  4. Al Umairi, K. (2024). Mediating effect of mathematics cognitive domain in the relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14990
  5. Arens, K., Frenzel, C., & Goetz, T. (2020). Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy in Math: Longitudinal Interrelations and Reciprocal Linkages with Achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(3), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1786347
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman.
  7. Baron, M., & Kenny, A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
  9. Colson, A., & Cooke, R. (2018). Expert Elicitation: Using the Classical Model to Validate Experts’ Judgments, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(1), 113–132, 2018. http://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex022
  10. Conchado, A., Martón, I., Alcover, R., Villanueva, F., Bás, C., Vázquez, E., Sánchez, I., Carrión, A., & Carot, M. (2017). Reliability analysis in scoring rubrics for assessing problem solving. pp. 6031-6037. http://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.2367
  11. Conlon, R. A., Barroso, C., & Ganley, C. M. (2023). Young children’s career aspirations: Gender differences, STEM ambitions, and expected skill use. The Career Development Quarterly, 71(1), 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12312
  12. Correa, A., Glas, M., & Opara, J. (2025). Females in higher education and leadership: insights from a multi-method approach. Frontiers in Education, 9(1485395), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1485395
  13. Czocher, A., Melhuish, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2019). Building mathematics self-efficacy of STEM undergraduates through mathematical modelling, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 807–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1634223
  14. Deemer, E., Lin, Ch., Graham, R., & Soto, C. (2016). Development and Validation of a Measure of Threatening Gender Stereotypes in Science: A Factor Mixture Analysis, Journal of Career Assessment, 24(1) 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565772
  15. Duarte, G., & Machado, L. M. (2019). Estereótipos de gênero, divisão sexual do trabalho e dupla jornada. Revista Sociais e Humanas, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.5902/2317175836316
  16. Esser, F., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Comparative research methods. In: Matthes, Jörg. International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1-22. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/149435/1/EsserVliegenthart_NCCRWP86_revisedFeb2017.pdf
  17. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using SPSS. 5ta ed. Sage Publications.
  18. Freedman, G., Green, M.C., Kussman, M., Drusano, M., & Moore, M. (2023). “Dear future woman of STEM”: letters of advice from women in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00411-0
  19. Gallegos, A., Luna, F., Alberca, N. E., Blanco, L. F., & Malpartida, F. (2022). Lucha de las mujeres por el acceso a la Universidad, Latinoamérica: caso Perú. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(1), 242-250. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rus/v14n1/2218-3620-rus-14-01-242.pdf
  20. González, E., & Rodríguez, Y. (2020). Estereotipos de género en la infancia. Pedagogía Social Revista Interuniversitaria, 36, 25-138. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2020.36.08
  21. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/ mathematics performance correspondence, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.20.3.0261
  22. Hiller, S. E., Kitsantas, A., Cheema, J. E., & Poulou, M. (2021). Mathematics anxiety and self-efficacy as predictors of mathematics literacy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(8), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1868589
  23. Hu, K. (2020). Become component within one day in generating Boxplots and violin Plots for a Novice without Prior R Experience, Methods and Protocols, 3(64), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3040064
  24. International Business Machines. (2023). IBM SPSS statistics. https://www.ibm.com/es-es/products/spss-statistics
  25. Iraola-Real, I., Huaman, L., Sanchez, C.M., & Andersson, C. (2021). Mathematical Self-efficacy and Collaborative Learning Strategies in Engineering Career Aspirants. In: Botto-Tobar, M., S. Gómez, O., Rosero Miranda, R., Díaz Cadena, A. (eds) Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies. ICAETT 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1302. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63665-4_10
  26. Iraola-Real, I., Matos, L., & Gargurevich, R. (2022). The type of motivation does matter for university preparation. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 39, e190177. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202239e190177
  27. Justicia-Galiano, J., Martín-Puga, E., Linares, R., & Pelegrina, S. (2023). Gender stereotypes about math anxiety: Ability and emotional components. Learning and Individual Differences, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102316
  28. Karagiannakis, N., Baccaglini-Frank, E., & Roussos, P. (2016). Detecting strengths and weaknesses in learning mathematics through a model classifying mathematical skills. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 21(2), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2017.1289963
  29. Kasturi, K., Sulton, S., & Wedi, A. (2021). How Self Efficacy in Mathematic Based on Gender Perspective? Edcomtech Jurnal Kajian Teknologu Pendidikan, 6(1), 36-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p036
  30. Lake, W., Wallin, M., Woolcott, G., Boyd, W., Foster, A., Markopoulos, C., & Boyd, W. (2016). Applying an alternative mathematics pedagogy for students with weak mathematics: meta-analysis of alternative pedagogies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1245876
  31. Ley N° 27337. Código de los Niños y del Adolescentes. (2 de agosto del 2000). Congreso de la República del Perú. Diario Oficial El Peruano, https://www.mimp.gob.pe/files/direcciones/dga/nuevo-codigo-ninos-adolescentes.pdf
  32. Ley N° 29733. Ley de Protección de Datos Personales. (21 de junio del 2011). Congreso de la República del Perú. Diario Oficial El Peruano, https://diariooficial.elperuano.pe/pdf/0036/ley-proteccion-datos-personales.pdf
  33. Lyakhova, S., & Joubert, M. (2022). Post-16 Further Mathematics blended learning: learner self-regulation, mathematical resilience and technology, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 41(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab005
  34. Lyakhova, S., & Neate, A. (2021). Further Mathematics, student choice and transition to university: part 2—non-mathematics STEM degrees, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(3), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab004
  35. Mathieson, R., & Homer, M. (2021). “I was told it would help with my Psychology”: Do post-16 Core Maths qualifications in England support other subjects? Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1959391
  36. McAlinden, M., & Noyes, A. (2019). Mathematics in the disciplines at the transition to university. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 38(2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry004
  37. McNeill, F., Wei, L. (2023). Encouraging Young Women into STEM Careers: A Study Comparing Career Intention of Female STEM Students in China and Scotland. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00114-9
  38. Medina-Neira, D., Caira-Chuquineyra, B., Fernandez-Guzman, D. (2025). Gender disparities in application and admission to the medical residency program in Peru: A cross sectional study from 2016 to 2023. PLoS ONE 20(1), e0316859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316859
  39. Mego-Sánchez, C., Huaman-Sarmiento, L., Iraola-Real, I., & Iraola-Arroyo, A. (2020). Niveles de Autoeficacia Matemática en estudiantes mujeres y varones aspirantes a la carrera de ingeniería. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, (38), 142-155. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8574392
  40. Navarro, M., Martin, A., Montoya, M., & Concha, S. (2024). Future primary teachers and pedagogical interactions with boys and girls. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14468
  41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (June 30, 2023). Equity and Inclusion in Education: Finding Strength through Diversity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9072e21-en
  42. Pehlivanli-Kadayifci, E. (2019). Exploring the Hidden Curriculum of Gender in Engineering Education: A Case of an Engineering Faculty in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 1194–1205.
  43. Reiner, S. (2017). Students' Mathematics Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Course Level at a Community College. [Doctoral thesis, Walden University], Mineápolis. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3579
  44. Ross, K., Galaudage, Sh., Clark, T., Lowson, N., Battasti, A., Adam, H., Ross, A. & Sweaney, N. (2023). Invisible women: gender representation in high school science courses across Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 67(3), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231197245
  45. Santana-Vega, L., Ruiz-Alfonso, Z., & Feliciano-García, L. (2023). Gender stereotypes and vocational variables in secondary education female students. Revista de Educación, 400, 265-294. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-400-578
  46. Stratton, S. (2021). Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649
  47. Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in Structural Equation Models, Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/270723
  48. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Las Mujeres en Ciencias, Tecnologías, Ingeniería y Matemáticas en América Latina y el Caribe. https://lac.unwomen.org/es/digiteca/publicaciones/2020/09/mujeres-en-ciencia-tecnologia-ingenieria-y-matematicas-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe
  49. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Inclusion and gender equality: brief on inclusion in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387889
  50. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2025a). Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). https://www.unesco.org/en/gender-equality/education/stem#:~:text=They%20are%20particularly%20under%2Drepresented,and%20consequently%2C%20in%20STEM%20careers.
  51. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2025b). 2025 International Day of Women and Girls in Science. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/2025-international-day-women-and-girls-science
  52. Usher, E., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
  53. Vos, H., Marinova, M., De León, S., Sasanguie, D., & Reynvoet, B. (2023). Gender differences in young adults' mathematical performance: Examining the contribution of working memory, math anxiety and gender-related stereotypes. Learning and Individual Differences, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102255
  54. Wolff-Michael, R., & von Unger, H. (2018). Current Perspectives on Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3155
  55. Xie, G., & Liu, X. (2023). Gender in mathematics: how gender role perception influences mathematical capability in junior high school. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(10), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00188-3
  56. Zając, T., Magda, I., Bożykowski, M., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., & Jasiński, M. (2024). Gender pay gaps across STEM fields of study. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2330667