Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1177 Download : 617

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematical literacy has an important role in solving students' real-life problems in supporting literacy skills, teachers can use real contexts as outlined in tasks in-class learning. The Bengkulu context can be used because it is closely related to the environment and students' daily live. This study aims to produce math literacy tasks in the Bengkulu context which are valid and potential impact on student literacy. The research employed a development design with a formative evaluative model using stages of self-evaluation, expert reviews, one-to-one, small group, and field tests. The subjects of the research were students in the eighth grade of a Junior High School in Bengkulu City. Data were collected through questionnaires, documentation, tests, and interviews. This study produced four mathematical literacy tasks with the Bengkulu context that met the criteria of being valid and having a potential impact. Mathematical tasks that are designed with the context can improve students' mathematical literacy activities. The use of tasks with context can be a learning resource that strengthens the introduction of students' local culture.

Keywords

Bengkulu Context Development Research Junior High School Mathematics Literacy Task

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Susanta, A., Sumardi, H., Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Mathematics literacy task on number pattern using Bengkulu context for junior high school students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp85-102
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
  2. Antonijević, R. (2016). Cognitive activities in solving mathematical tasks: The role of a cognitive obstacle. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2503–2515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1306a
  3. Atsnan, M. F., Gazali, R. Y., Nareki. M. L. (2018). Pengaruh Pendekatan Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Representasi dan Literasi Matematis Siswa [The Effect of the Problem-Solving Approach on Students' Representational Ability and Mathematical Literacy]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i2.20120
  4. Berisha, V., & Bytyqi, R. (2020). Types of mathematical tasks used in secondary classroom instruction. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20617
  5. Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2011). A ‘task-centric approach’ to professional development: Enhancing and sustaining mathematics teachers’ ability to implement cognitively challenging mathematical tasks. ZDM, 43(6), 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0353-2
  6. Clarke, D., & Roche, A. (2018). Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.006
  7. Dewantara, A.H., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2015). Assessing seventh graders? Mathematical literacy in solving PISA-like tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.2.2163.117-128
  8. Drew, S. V. (2012). Open up the ceiling on the common core state standards: preparing students for 21st-century literacy-now. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00145
  9. Hatisaru, V. (2020). Exploring evidence of mathematical tasks and representations in the drawings of middle school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0609. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8482
  10. Hoogland, K., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., Pepin, B. E., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.004
  11. Holenstein, M., Bruckmaier, G., & Grob, A. (2021). Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: An integrative longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00491-4
  12. Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between mathematical literacy and opportunity to learn with different types of mathematical tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13625.199-222
  13. Jailani, J., Retnawati, H., Wulandari, N. F., & Djidu, H. (2020). Mathematical literacy proficiency development based on content, context, and process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.80
  14. Jannah, R. D., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2019). Soft tennis and volleyball context in Asian Games for PISA-like mathematics problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5248.157-170
  15. Kaiser, G., & Willander, T. (2005). Development of mathematical literacy: Results of an empirical study. Teaching mathematics and its applications, 24(2-3), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hri016
  16. Kazima, M., Jakobsen, A., Kasoka, D. N. (2016). Use of mathematical tasks of teaching and the corresponding lmt measures in the Malawi context. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1), 171-186. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol13/iss1/11
  17. Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 59, Tahun 2013, tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah [Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 59, Year 2013, concerning the 2013 Curriculum for Senior High Schools/Madrasah Aliyah]
  18. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
  19. Kohar, A. W., Zulkardi, Z., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2014). Developing Pisa-like mathematics tasks to promote students? Mathematical literacy. Proceeding 2nd SEA-DR International Conference, 14-26
  20. Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2020). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.467
  21. Kurniati, C. N, & Mariani, S. (2020). Qualitative analysis on mathematical literacy ability and student responsibility with realistic mathematics education learning models of ethnomathematics nuance. UJME, 9(3), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v9i3.44539
  22. Larasaty, B. M., Mustiani, M., & Pratini, H. S. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP BOPKRI 3 Yogyakarta Melalui Pendekatan PMRI Berbasis PISA pada Materi Pokok SPLDV. [Improving the Mathematical Literacy Ability of Grade VII Students of SMP BOPKRI 3 Yogyakarta Through the PISA-Based PMRI Approach on SPLDV Main Material]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Etnomatnesia
  23. Maj-Tatsis, B., & Tatsis, K. (2019). Task characteristics that promote mathematical reasoning among young students: An exploratory case study. In Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11) (No.15). Freudenthal Group; Freudenthal Institute; ERME.
  24. Mahmudah, F. N., & Putra, E. C. S. (2021). Tinjauan pustaka sistematis manajemen pendidikan: Kerangka konseptual dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan era 4.0 [Systematic literature review on education management: A conceptual framework for improving the quality of education in the 4.0 era]. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v9i1.33713
  25. Montoya, S. (2018, October). Defining literacy. In GAML Fifth meeting, pp. 17-18, http://uis.unesco.org/
  26. Murdy, R., & Ekawati, R. (2021). Levels of students mathematics literacy using Indonesian culture context. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v5n1.p1-19
  27. Muslimah, H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berbentuk soal cerita [Analysis of students' mathematical literacy ability in solving mathematical problems in the form of story problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 8(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v8i1.30000
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  29. Nurkamilah, M., Nugraha, M. F., & Sunendar, A. (2018). Mengembangkan literasi matematika siswa sekolah dasar melalui pembelajaran matematika realistik Indonesia [Developing elementary school students' mathematical literacy through realistic Indonesian mathematics learning]. Jurnal Theorems (The Original Research of Mathematics), 2(2), 70-79.
  30. Nyman, R. (2016). What makes a mathematical task interesting? Academic Journals, 11(16), 1509-1520, http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR
  31. OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: first results from the OECD programme for international student assessment (PISA) 2000. USA: OECD-PISA
  32. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  33. OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Mathematics Framework. New York: Columbia University
  34. OECD. (2019a). Country Note (Results from PISA 2018) Indonesian. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  35. OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018. PISA 2018 Result Combined Executive Summaries. PISAOECD Publishing
  36. Oktiningrum, W., & Wardhani, D. A. P. (2020). Developing hot mathematics task with Indonesian heritage as context to assess mathematical literacy of students in primary school. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i1.1997
  37. Oktiningrum, W., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing PISA-like mathematics task with Indonesia natural and cultural heritage as context to assess students’ mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2812.1-8
  38. Papadopoulos, I. (2020). Using tasks to bring challenge in mathematics classroom. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 375-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020063021
  39. Paredes, S., Cáceres, M. J., Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Blanco, T. F., & Chamoso, J. M. (2020). Creating realistic mathematics tasks involving authenticity, cognitive domains, and openness characteristics: A study with pre-service teachers. Sustainability, 12(22), 9656. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229656
  40. Pepin, B. (2015). Enhancing mathematics/STEM education: A ‘resourceful’ approach. Inaugural lecture, 27 November 2015, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
  41. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. In Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at the East China Normal University [Z]. Shanghai: SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
  42. Pratiwi, I., Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi. (2019). Long jump in Asian Games: Contexts of PISA-like mathematics problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 81-92. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5250.81-92
  43. Pusmendik-Kemendikbud. (2022). Asesmen kompetensi minimum. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan Kemendikbudristek [Minimum competency assessment. Center for Education Assessment of the Ministry of Education and Culture]
  44. Puspendik-Kemendikbud. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia belajar dari hasil PISA 2018 [Education in Indonesia learns from the results of the 2018 PISA]. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud
  45. Putri, R. I. I, & Zulkardi. (2020). Designing PISA-like mathematics task using Asian games context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 135-144. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9786.135-144.
  46. Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2022). The circumstances of literacy numeracy skill: Between notion and fact from elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 9-18.https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.36427
  47. Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019, February). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042088. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088
  48. Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100-107. http://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10649
  49. Stacey, K., Almuna, F., Caraballo, R. M., Chesné, J. F., Garfunkel, S., Gooya, Z., & Perl, H. (2015). PISA’s influence on thought and action in mathematics education. In Assessing Mathematical Literacy (pp. 275-306). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_15
  50. Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and numeracy: Two literacies, one language. The Mathematics Educator, 6(1), 1016. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-5-15
  51. Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4681-1
  52. Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2003). The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students?. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217373
  53. Susanta, A., Sumardi, H., & Zulkardi, Z. (2022). Development of e-module using Bengkulu contexts to improve literacy skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.2.17698.171-186
  54. Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. London: Kogan Page.
  55. Van den Akker, J. (2013). Educational Design Research Part (a): An introduction. Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
  56. Vebrian, R., Putra, Y.Y., Saraswati, S., & Wijaya, T.T. (2021). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika kontekstual [Students' mathematical reasoning abilities in solving contextual mathematical literacy questions]. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2602-2614. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i
  57. Widjaja, W. (2013). The use of contextual problems to support mathematical learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.413.151-159
  58. Wijaya, A., den Heuvel-Panhuizen, V., Doorman, M., & Veldhuis, M. (2018). Opportunity-to-learn to solve context-based mathematics tasks and students' performance in solving these tasks–lessons from Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1598, https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93420
  59. Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015, February). Identifying ways to improve student performance on context-based mathematics tasks. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 944-950). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01287272
  60. Wijaya, R. P., Budiarto, M. T., Wijayanti, P. (2021). Development of realistic mathematics learning tools to improve students' mathematical literacy ability. Mathematics Education Journals, 5(2), 124-131. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/MEJ/article/view/16571
  61. Yeo, J. B. (2007). Mathematical tasks: Clarification, classification and choice of suitable tasks for different types of learning and assessment. Mathematics and Mathematics Education National Institute of Education Technical Report ME2007-01
  62. Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers’ professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15, 15–20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248183
  63. Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2006). Mendesain sendiri soal kontekstual matematika [design your own contextual math problem]. In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Matematika XIII, 2006
  64. Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Alwi, Z., Nusantara, D. S., Ambarita, S. M., Maharani, Y., & Puspitasari, L. (2020). How students work with PISA-like mathematical tasks using COVID-19 context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 405-416.
  65. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12915.405-416
  66. Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Supporting mathematics teachers to develop jumping task using PISA framework (JUMPISA). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.12115.199-210
  67. Zulkardi. (2002). Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers. Published Dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
  68. Zulkardi. (2006). Formative evaluation: What, why, when, and how. (Online). http://www.geocities.com/zulkardi/books.html
  69. Wong, P. K. (2005). Mathematical literacy of Hong Kong’s 15-year-old students in PISA. Education Journal, 32(1), 91-120.