Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1064 Download : 534

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Permutations and combinations are generally taught by requiring students to memorize formulas and solve problems using the appropriate formula. Students who learn these topics may succeed in gaining high scores on end-of-chapter exams in textbooks, while lacking the conceptual understanding required to deal with problems in the real world. Therefore, this study aimed to examine in-service mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) to determine students’ mistakes in solving permutations and combinations problem and their teaching strategies to eliminate these errors. Data were collected by distributing vignettes, CoRe, and PaP-eRs to thirteen mathematics teachers from ten provinces in Indonesia after they finished an online professional teacher education program to determine their PCK in teaching permutations and combinations. The data collected were analyzed qualitatively using a content analysis approach to obtain categories inductively. The result showed that PCK of in-service mathematics in teaching permutations and combinations was observed by identifying student mistakes conceptually and procedurally, even though some could not determine their mistakes in permutations. On the other hand, the knowledge of instructional strategies can engage all students in active learning, but most of them only give general answers. Furthermore, an in-depth understanding of permutations and combinations topic is needed to support the development of teachers’ pedagogic competencies sustainably. The contribution of this research will be of interest to curriculum development and mathematics educators.

Keywords

In-Service Mathematics Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Permutation and Combination Qualitative Content Analysis Students Mistakes

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Matitaputty, C., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., & Sukoriyanto. (2022). Examining the pedagogical content knowledge of in-service mathematics teachers on the permutations and combinations in the context of student mistakes. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp393-414
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abrahamson, D., & Cendak, M. R. (2006). The Odds of Understanding the Law of Large Numbers: A Design for Grounding Intuitive Probability in Combinatorial Analysis. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 1–8.
  2. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  3. Batanero, C., Navarro-Pelayo, V., & Godino, J. D. (1997). Efect of the implicit combinatorial model on combinatorial reasoning in secondary school pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002954428327
  4. Busadee, N., & Laosinchai, P. (2013). Authentic Problems in High School Probability Lesson: Putting Research into Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2043–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.162
  5. Cao, Y., Zhang, S., Chan, M. C. E., & Kang, Y. (2021). Post-pandemic reflections: lessons from Chinese mathematics teachers about online mathematics instruction. In Asia Pacific Education Review (Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 157–168). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09694-w
  6. Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar-González, Á., Ribeiro, M., & Muñoz-Catalán, M. C. (2018). The mathematics teacher’s specialised knowledge (MTSK) model*. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981
  7. Chick, H., & Beswick, K. (2018). Teaching teachers to teach Boris: a framework for mathematics teacher educator pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(5), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9362-y
  8. Chotikarn, N., Kanhapong, A., Tupsai, J., & Yuenyong, C. (2021). Enhancing Grade 11 students ’ representation and connection in permutation and combination for their problem solving Enhancing Grade 11 students ’ representation and connection in permutation and combination for their problem solving. Jin Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012023
  9. Eizenberg, M. M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2004). Students ’ Verification Strategies for Combinatorial Problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0601
  10. English, L. D. (2005). Combinatorics and the development of children’s combinatorial reasoning. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 121–141). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11. Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1988). The combinatorial solving capacity in children and adolescents. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 5, 193–198.
  12. Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in Learning Basic Concepts in Probability and Statistics: Implications for Research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44–63.
  13. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
  14. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  15. Hubeňáková, V., & Semanišinová, I. (2020). Preservice teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching combinatorial thinking. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (ERME), 0243042.
  16. Kemdikbud, Dirjen GTK. (2020). Pedoman Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru dalam Jabatan [In-service Teacher Professional Education Program Guidelines]. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Profesi dan Pembinaan Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan
  17. Korkmaz, H. I., & Şahin, Ö. (2020). Preservice Preschool Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Geometric Shapes in Terms of Children’s Mistakes. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1701150
  18. Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach. In Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 181–197). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_8
  19. Kuo, T. (2009). A New Method for Generating Permutations in Lexicographic Order. Journal of Science and Engineering Technology, 5(4), 21–29.
  20. Lamanna, L., Gea, M. M., & Batanero, C. (2022a). Do Secondary School Students’ Strategies in Solving Permutation and Combination Problems Change with Instruction? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00228-z
  21. Lamanna, L., Gea, M. M., & Batanero, C. (2022b). Secondary school students’ strategies in solving combination problems. In Bozen-Bolzano (Ed.), Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Edu- cation (CERME12) (p. hal-03751834).
  22. Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. T., & Riemer, J. F. (2012). Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs; Wiley:Weinheim.
  23. Lockwood, E. (2011). Student connections among counting problems: An exploration using actor-oriented transfer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9320-7
  24. Lockwood, E. (2013). A model of students’ combinatorial thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.008
  25. Lockwood, E., A. Swinyard, C., & S. Caughman, J. (2015). Patterns, Sets of Outcomes, and Combinatorial Justification: Two Students’ Reinvention of Counting Formulas. In International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0001-2
  26. Lockwood, E., Reed, Z., & Caughman, J. S. (2017). An Analysis of Statements of the Multiplication Principle in Combinatorics, Discrete, and Finite Mathematics Textbooks. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(3), 381–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0045-y
  27. Loong, E. Y. K. (2014). Using the internet in high school mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.2.1496.108-126
  28. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and Developing Science Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge 2nd Edition. Sense Publishers.
  29. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In Search of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science: Developing Ways of Articulating and Documenting Professional Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
  30. Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (9th Edition). In Pearson Education Limited (Ninth edit). Pearson Education Limited.
  31. Martin, G. (2001). Counting: The Art of Enumerative Combinatorics. Springer.
  32. Melusova, J., & Vidermanova, K. (2015). Upper-secondary Students’ Strategies for Solving Combinatorial Problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 1703–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.223
  33. NCTM. (2000). Principles Standards and for School Mathematics. Reston, VA
  34. Permendikbud No. 37. (2018). Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Available online at jdih.kemdikbud.go.id (accessed on 4 May 2022)
  35. Quinn, J. R., & Wiest, R. L. (1998). A Constructivist Approach to Teaching Permutations and Combinations. Teaching Statistic, 20(3), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.20305/it202202111142
  36. Rungtusanatham, M., Wallin, C., & Eckerd, S. (2011). The vignette in a scenario-based role-playing experiment. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03232.x
  37. Salavatinejad, N., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2021). Toward a model for students’ combinatorial thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61(100823), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100823
  38. Sandefur, J., Lockwood, E., Hart, E., & Greefrath, G. (2022). Teaching and Learning Discrete Mathematics. ZDM-Mathematics Education, https://do. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_51
  39. Semanišinová, I. (2021). Multiple-solution tasks in pre-service teachers’ course on combinatorics. Mathematics, 9(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182286
  40. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  41. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
  42. Siegel, M. (1986). Report of The Committee on Discrete Mathematics in the First Two Years.
  43. Smith, C. E. (2007). On Students’ Conceptualizations of Combinatorics: A Multiple Case Study. University od Minnesota.
  44. Soto, O., Siy, K., & Harel, G. (2022). Promoting a set-oriented way of thinking in a U.S. High School discrete mathematics class: a case study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01337-7
  45. Subanji. (2015). Teori Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika [Error Theory of Concept Construction and Mathematical Problem Solving]. Universitas Negeri Malang: UM Press.
  46. Sukoriyanto, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Candra, T. D. (2016a). Students’ Thinking Interference of Real Global Type in Solving Permutation and Combination Problems. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(5), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0605034750
  47. Sukoriyanto, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016b). Students’ Errors in Solving the Permutation and Combination Problems Based on Problem Solving Steps of Polya. International Education Studies, 9(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p11
  48. Tchoshanov, M. A. (2011). Relationship between teacher knowledge of concepts and connections, teaching practice, and student achievement in middle grades mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9269-y
  49. Turkdogan, A., Baki, A., & Cepni, S. (2009). The Anatomy of Mistakes: Categorizing Students ’ Mistakes in Mathematics within Learning Theories. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 1(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.09564
  50. Yetkin, E. (2003). Student Difficulties in Learning Elementary Student Difficulties in Learning Elementary. ERIC Digest., 1–6.
  51. Yunianto, W., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Crisan, C. (2021). Indonesian mathematics teachers’ knowledge of content and students of area and perimeter of rectangle. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.2.13537.223-238
  52. Zhang, Y. (2015). Pedagogical content knowledge in early mathematics: What teachers know and how it associates with teaching and learning. Loyola University, Chicago, IL.